THE HITLER YOU DON’T KNOW – MULTICULTURALISM IN HITLERS GERMANY

Link

THE HITLER YOU DON’T KNOW – MULTICULTURALISM IN HITLERS GERMANY

There is no such thing as a race or a religion making people more criminal or rapist or thieves. The behavior of people doesn’t come from their DNA. There is no such thing as “better race”, or “superior race”.


This conspiracy of race supremacy has been attributed falsely to Adolf Hitler and exists only in Judaism. This falsification and propaganda created the false followers of a “false Hitler”. They are today called the “white supremacists” who follow this ideology that white people are smarter or well mannered just because they are whites or Christians.

All races are equals, but are not the same, they are diverse with different physical abilities and characteristics. That’s why you can see each group of people from the same ethnicity having some common traits, such as large nose allowing them to breath faster in hearts exercises, some have big strong bodies allowing them to support hard work, the Aryan, the Japanese women have white skin which makes them resist cold weather, the African women have Black skin which makes them support hot weather. The behavior of people comes from education, and it is done by the society, family and school.

In the years 1930’s the world was very different than now, people were more confined in their geographical zones, there was no Multiculturalism as today in the western world, much less travels, and people moved very rarely. Adolf Hitler was not racist, his country was diverse naturally at that time, his troops who joined him in the war, were from a hundred countries inside and outside Europe they were all treated with respect regarding their religions & ethnicities.

Hitler wanted each ethnic and religious group to have his right to exist and practice peacefully his believes. For his Muslim troops, he offered for each one a Quran with Swastika drawn on it, he allowed his SS Muslim troops to have a “Mullah” or religious leader, and they can pray during the times of prayers.

German racialism was to preserve the identity of each group, It is exactly the opposite of what we are seeing today with Multiculturalism & Globalism. This is because we let Jews run our education and media, they tell us it is retard to be proud of our identity, culture, ethnicity, religion and we should all be the “same”. Then they put us against each others, falsify history about some groups, then they tell us Muslims are bad, Whites are the problem, Blacks are evil… They do that to rule us all, they don’t care about Blacks, Whites, Muslims, Christians.

Hitler banned Jews from media and education, this created peace in society. What is happening today in South Africa, America, Europe? Most aggressions are racial and religious crimes, it doesn’t mean all crimes are like that, but most of them. It is because each group receives the information to blame the other groups for his miseries, but not all people fell in this trap, only the uneducated and desperate fell in this trap.

What do you think about this Afro-German boy in 1930’s?

To draw recruits away from both the rival “right” Nationalists and “left” Socialist parties, Hitler simply adds  ‘National’ and Socialist’ to his party’s  name, making it NSDAP- ‘The National Socialist German Workers Party’ (They never called themselves Nazis!!)


To draw recruits away from the Red Communists, Hitler uses red flags, with a symbol  of the ancient Aryans of Asia

MORE RELATED –

• ADOLPH HITLER – MAN OF PEACE ?!
• 5 UNDENIABLE FACTS ABOUT WW2 YOU WERE NEVER TOLD
• THE REAL REASON WHY GERMANY MUST PERISH ! 
• HITLER WAS A JEW? A ROTHSCHILD?? REALLY ???
• ADOLPH HITLER’S FINAL TESTAMENT
• BRANDON MARTINEZ INTERVIEWS HISTORIAN AND AUTHOR VERONICA CLARK
• MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER DEMOLISHES KOSHER ANTI-HITLER MYTHS

TEXE MARRS INTERVIEWS MS KING ON NEW BOOK – ‘THE BAD WAR’ TRUTH ABOUT WW2

FRIEND AND MENTOR HENRY MAKOW PH.D DISAGREES WITH ME ABOUT HITLER – I HIGHLY RESPECT THE FORMER PROFESSOR AND AGREE WITH HIM ON EVERYTHING CONCERNING THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXCEPT WHEN THE SUBJECT TURNS TO HITLER – YOU CAN CHECK OUT HIS ARTICLE BELOW TO GET THE OTHER VIEWPOINT  – AND PLEASE CHECK OUT HIS ARCHIVES ON FEMINISM AND HOMOSEXUALITY – HE IS BY FAR THE LEADING AUTHORITY IN THE TRUTH MOVEMENT ON THOSE TWO TOPICS – I WILL SAY AUTHOR MS KING’S BOOK ‘THE BAD WAR’ IS WHAT CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT HITLER. SO BE SURE TO LOOK AT ALL SIDES OF THE DEBATE LIKE I DID BEFORE YOU MAKE A CONCLUSION FOR YOURSELF ABOUT THE FUHRER  ! GOD BLESS ALL OF YOU AND STAY WARM !

WAS HITLER A ILLUMINATI AGENT ?  – HENRY MAKOW

Zionism and the Third Reich – Was Hitler a Zionist Agent? Did Hitler Create Israel??

Link

Zionism and the Third Reich – Was Hitler a Zionist Agent? Did Hitler Create Israel??

This is part 3 in series dealing with the issues concerning Hitler, National Socialist Germany and the Jews. In the first part, I demonstrated that powerful and influential self-described “Jews” in New York and London declared war on Germany in 1933, and launched a world wide economic warfare against her, based upon bogus atrocity stories. In part 2, I showed that the largest and most influential Jewish organization in Germany at the time, publicly stated that these stories were untrue and that they themselves attempted to defend National Socialist Germany against the vile, slanderous atrocity propaganda, and how of their own accord, they took measures to re-assure the world that the atrocity stories were untrue, and moreover, that these stories were doing more harm than good, by fanning anti-Jewish sentiments within Germany. Now let’s turn to the issue of Zionism.

Many in the so-called “truth movement” today claim that Hitler was a Jew and / or a Rothschild, or a Zionist agent, and hence; that was “founder of Israel”. I have already dealt with this in a variety of previous posts and refuted those lies, but let’s look more closely now at the “Zionist agent” allegations. The so-called “Jewish Question” was not something that Hitler invented nor a problem that Hitler alone had perceived of. It was well discussed by Churchill and Roosevelt, and many others in Europe too. Hitler openly acknowledged the problem, which was also acknowledged by the Zionist Jews themselves!

Hitler sought to work with them to bring about a mutually beneficial solution. He did not, however, “ally” himself with the Zionists, as many today claim, but rather acknowledged them as a distinct race and culture, and he negotiated with them honourably, right in the midst of a wave of global Anti-Germanism, created and fanned by self-described “International Jewry”, which I believe was really a just front organization for the International Bankster Gangsters, the very same interests which Hitler decried and attempted to free his people from.

This group were attempting to strangle Germany economically, in the hope that the Hitler’s government would then collapse, return to the status quo: the Weimar “free for all” Republic, and the dictates of the Versailles Treaty,  under which the International Bankster Gangsters could then go back to “business as usual” in bleeding Germany to a slow and painful death. And, thereby removing a real competitor from the world market.  Not to mention leaving her and Europe wide open to the Soviet Bolshevik menace. Thus, the “status quo” was NOT acceptable to the Germans, which is precisely why Hitler and the NSDAP were elected to government and was NOT an option!


No other countries wished to take large numbers of Jews, and no other organization was in place with whom they could negotiate. Hitler’s support for them, however, was limited!

Excerpt from Zionism and The Third Reich, by Mark Weber (IHR)

Official Reservations

German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their” governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state… /23″

FULL ARTICLE: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html

The above article by historian Mark Weber is also available as a free podcast here

To further understand the “Transfer Agreement” between NS Germany and the Zionists, I recommend you listen to the following. or download the free booklet and read it for yourself.:

VIDEO: Deanna Spingola – The Transfer Agreement Boycott Fever of 1933


Deanna Spingola reads from the book: The Transfer Agreement Boycott Fever of 1933 by by Professor Udo Walendy. This 40 page booklet goes into all of the pertinent background information regarding the declaration of war against Germany by self-described “World Jewry” or “Judea” , and their global boycott of German goods and services, based upon anti-German propaganda. Their objective was to bring Germany to her knees and to destroy her. They began to implement this plan, under false pretences (pretexts) , as soon as the National Socialists came to power, in order to undermine Hitler and the NS economic rescue plan, and thereby, subvert the democratically expressed will of the German people who had elected his party. It was a “False Flag Operation” of global proportions.

Hitler’s party platform did indeed include an appeal for racial purity in Germany, and the removal of Jews from positions of power and influence, and a return of power to the people.  Even after the Nuremberg Laws were decreed, Jews however, could still make appeals to Hitler directly from exemptions, and he was dealing with these daily until at least late 1942 or early 1943 (well into the war).   It must be noted too that, it was the British who put an end to emigration to Palestine when the war started, leaving any who wished to emigrate to Palestine stranded in Germany and later in transit camps. The western powers also refused to cooperate with Germany  on alternative plans to have the Jews emigrate to locations such as Madagascar.  But not all Jews wanted to leave Germany. Most rather enjoyed living there and wanted to stay.  Approximately 150,000 loyal Jews served in the military and defended National Socialist Germany.  Proven loyalty and devotion to Germany was always the key!  I will cover this in more detail with expert sources at a later date.

It must also be underscored again, however, that Hitler’s support of Jewish immigration to Palestine was NEVER intended to be at the expense of the Palestinians, for whom he had great empathy, and he also worked closely with the Grand Mufti to support their cause, and vice versa.

VIDEO: Hitler speaks on the plight of the Palestinians and of USA and British hypocrisy 1939

In the picture below, the Grand Mufti Husseini meets with Adolf Hitler in Berlin

The picture below is of National Socialist supporters in Palestine.

Would this be possible if Hitler was a “Zionist Agent”? Do you think these people considered Hitler as the man responsible for the creation of modern day Israel? Or rather, as their ally?

Before wrapping this up, I will leave you with the following for your further consideration which demonstrates (again) the utter hypocrisy of the “ALL LIES”.  Moreover, I believe it is further evidence of a criminal conspiracy to demonize Hitler and NS Germany for the sake of a profitable war, and for the protection of the interests of the self-described “Jewish” Bankster Gangsters, even at the expense of Jews in Germany and Europe. It is high-time for people to re-examine everything they thought they knew regarding Hitler, National Socialist Germany and World War II.

Allied Hypocrisy and Collusion:

What FDR said about Jews in private

By Rafael Medoff, Los Angeles times, April 7, 2013

In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called “the best way to settle the Jewish question.”

In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions “should be definitely limited” so as to “eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.” [FDR also]… dismissed pleas for Jewish refugees as “Jewish wailing” and “sob stuff”; expressing (to a senator ) his pride that “there is no Jewish blood in our veins”; and characterizing a tax maneuver by a Jewish newspaper publisher as “a dirty Jewish trick.” But the most common theme in Roosevelt’s private statements about Jews has to do with his perception that they were “overcrowding” many professions and exercising undue influence. ”
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-medoff-roosevelt-holocaust-20130407,0,581781.story

Sir Winston Churchill: Zionist Hero

http://www.independent.co.uk

“Jewish supporters of Winston Churchill are to unveil a bust of the British wartime leader in Jerusalem this weekend in what they say is a long-overdue recognition of his staunch and unwavering support of the Jewish cause and their desire for a homeland.

“As a passionate Zionist all his life and a philo-semite, Churchill has been under-recognised,” says Anthony Rosenfelder, a trustee of the Jerusalem Foundation, which is behind the project to commemorate the British leader. He “combined a historical understanding of the Jewish people and what the promised land meant for Jews … with realpolitik”.

It is perhaps ironic that a statue of Churchill should stand just yards away from the King David Hotel, scene of a deadly Jewish terror attack on British military headquarters in 1946 that was to hasten the demise of mandate rule in Palestine.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/sir-winston-churchill-zionist-hero-8277918.html

RELATED INFO:

• Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild by Robert John
• Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means by Mark Weber
• Zionism vs Bolshevism by Winston Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald February 8, 1920, page 5 (David Irving)

Estimated 190,000 German Women Raped by US Soldiers After WWII

Link

Estimated 190,000 German Women Raped by US Soldiers After WWII

Around 860,000 German women and girls were raped by Allied soldiers at the end of World War Two, according to a new book published in Germany which estimates that more than one in five rapes were committed by US troops.

The accepted historical view in the West characterizing Allied soldiers who arrived in Germany, once the Nazis were already defeated, as liberators, and their Soviet counterparts as rapists and pillagers, is being challenged in a new book published in Germany, which alleges that Soviet troops far from alone in committing sexual violence against the local population.

Nazi Hideout Myth Busted? Mysterious Ruins in Argentina Could Predate WWII

It is worth mentioning that the narrative of "atrocities" committed by the Red Army soldiers in Germany after the defeat of the Nazis has been wildly exaggerated over the course of the last 25 years. The issue has been used for  anti-Russian propaganda aimed at lessening the role of the USSR in defeating Nazi Germany. Curiously, at the same time Western-based historians have turned a blind eye to the rape committed by American and other Western Allied soldiers on occupied German territories.

"Until now, it has been said that between one and two million women and girls were raped by troops of the Red Army," Miriam Gebhardt, the book's author, told Suddeutche Zeitung in an interview last week. "I think there were fewer cases, around 860,000, which also includes victims of western Allied soldiers. Around 190,000 of those may have been victims of US soldiers."

"Around four to five percent of 'occupation children,' who have a German mother and Allied soldier father, were conceived as a result of rape," said Gebhardt, explaining how she got her figures. "Statistically, one from every 100 rapes produces a child," adding that her figures "are based on conservative estimates, they are not set in stone."
As well as statistical evidence, Gebhardt explores memoirs such as those of a priest of the Archdiocese of Munich and Freisin, which were also studied last year by journalist Maximiliane Saalfrank, according to whom "rape came to almost every village."

The subject of rape committed by Soviet soldiers has been covered before in popular culture, notably in the 1992 Helke Sander film "Liberators and Liberated," which was the first to cover the topic of rape committed by Soviet soldiers. In 2009 the film Anonyma: A Woman in Berlin," was released, based on the 1959 memoir of the same name, which also described rape by Russian soldiers.

The Slight of Slights: US Neocons Try to Rewrite History of WWII

"After the war, it was easier to talk about the Red Army raping women," says Gerhardt, than to challenges to the collective memory of the western Allies in 1945 as liberators. Stereotypes from the First World War of uncivilized Russians from the East, and Nazi-era propaganda about the Red Army also played their role, explains the author of the book, called "When the Soldiers Came."


While spreading stories of "uncivilized" and "brutal" Russian soldiers, many Western historians have remained silent on the massive casualties sustained by the Soviet Union during the Second World War. While the war claimed the lives of 418,000 Americans, 600,000 French nationals and 450,000 Britons, the USSR's casualties amounted to 27 million. On Soviet territory, Nazi soldiers committed hideous atrocities on a scale that could hardly be imagined by the West, such as the hanging and burning alive of peaceful civilians, including women and children.

'US beating drums of war against Russia to increase European defense spending'

Link

'US beating drums of war against Russia to increase European defense spending'

Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford testifies during the Senate Armed Services committee nomination hearing to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Capitol Hill in Washington, July 9, 2015.

European leaders know that the US wants to get them to spend money on military equipment which will be purchased from the US, says Brian Becker of the anti-war Answer Coalition. But Europe knows the dangers from the experience of two world wars, he added.

Several senior American officials say Russia is the greatest threat to their country's national security. First it was Secretary of the Air Force Deborah James, then General Joseph Dunford at his confirmation hearing for the position of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff called Russian actions “nothing short of alarming.”


RT: Several senior American officials say Russia is the greatest threat to US national security. Why is such rhetoric being employed by senior American officials?

US military leaders call Russia ‘greatest threat’, demand more funding

Brian Becker: We have to understand this rhetoric and these presentations first by the Air Force Secretary Deborah James and Major General Joseph Dunford, soon to be Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, both of whom pose the presentation that Russia is an existential threat and the greatest threat to America.

They also say, and this is very interesting, that it requires the 28 NATO members to step up and do their part to spend at least two per cent of their GDP on military spending in NATO, and only four of the 28 members of NATO are doing it so far. What the US military officials are basically telling NATO is: “Get in line, this is an existential threat, you have to spend more of your money, money that is being drained from other parts of the economies of Europe." A lot of that money will go to US war contractors. So the ABCs of the war propaganda Russia is an existential threat is that it is very good, very necessary in fact for the biggest war contractors, the biggest parts of the military industrial complex in America. That is one part of the story.

RT: What is calling Russia 'the biggest threat'' and lumping it in with Islamic State going to lead to?

BB: It doesn’t just lump Russia in with ISIS, it says “Russia is a greater threat to the US and to the West, and to world peace than ISIS.” Now you see the US’s government right now is at war, endless war with IS because purportedly it poses an existential threat. But if the existential threat posed by Russia is even greater than IS, you can make the case, and I think it’s absolutely true, that the US military is preparing the American public for military confrontation, conflict of some type with Russia, which would seem to all people to be absolute madness.

Nonetheless, they must be doing this to prepare the population to allow greater and greater military threats to go against Russia. Now, once the Pentagon claims the escalation ladder, carries out massive war exercises on Russia’s border, Russia will be compelled to meet that threat. That’s how conflicts go from small conflicts to bigger conflicts, and even possible global conflicts.



RT: European officials have been so far reluctant to boost military spending for NATO. Do they not fear any imminent threats that the US is citing?

BB: The European powers know absolutely that this is hogwash. They know with certainty that the US is beating the drums of war in order to get them to spend more of their money on military equipment, much of which will be purchase from the US. And they also know that it’s easy for American politicians, and the Generals in America are just politicians in uniform before they become big businessman when they circulate back into corporate America, they know that they are playing with fire. It is very easy for American officials to talk tough against Russia. But Europe knows all too well, the dangers of real war, the danger of WWI and WWII which is 70 years over this year. They don’t take lightly to the fact that the Pentagon is playing with fire. And of course it will be the European people who will be on the frontlines, not Americans.

RT: US military officials said that they knew Europe was facing tough economic challenges, but NATO commitments should still be a priority. Is this talk of threats a way to secure NATO funding?

BB: Yes, that was my point. I think a lot of this is to keep the alliance together. They know that Germany and France, and other major European powers could start to have very warm and good relations - economic, political, and even possibly military relations with Russia. They are trying to keep the discipline of the alliance, and they are also trying to make sure that those countries pay their fair share to the war effort, to the NATO war effort, which, as I said, benefits US war corporations.

Units from NATO allied countries take part in the NATO Noble Jump 2015 exercises, part of testing and refinement of the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) in Swietoszow, Poland June 18, 2015.

US Secretary of the Air Force and United States Marine Corps general not diplomats

Paul Heroux, Middle East expert also commented on Deborah James’s and General Joseph Dunford’s statements that Russia is the greatest threat to US national security saying that “Their job is to bring to attention what, in their point of view, is going to be a big threat.”

RT: European officials have been so far reluctant to boost military spending on NATO. Why do you think that is?

Paul Heroux: There could be a number of reasons. The crisis in Greece right now is putting pressure on other European counties because there is maybe a need for a debt bailout. But at the same time we don’t want to go back to the old ways of huge deficit spending on the military. I would like to think we’ve progressed a lot more and we’re going to do more diplomatic solutions.

RT: You talk about diplomatic solutions... Is it diplomatic to call Russia 'the biggest threat' to American security?

PH: No, I don’t think it is. But I also think that was made by somebody whose job is not to be a diplomat, somebody who is either a general or secretary of one of the branches of our [US] armed forces. Their job is to bring to attention what, in their point of view, is going to be a big threat.


We also have other people in the US saying that the biggest threat to US security is cyber terrorism, or cyber security; other people say it might be global warming; other folks might say it’s ISIS or terrorism, and some might even say the nuclear program in Iran.

RT: Does calling Russia "the biggest threat" suggest the deterioration in relations between Moscow and Washington? Is that the sign there is no real hope for dissent dialogue in the next coming weeks and months?

PH: Deterioration has been going on for a number of years, that’s right. From the point of view of the US, Russia is the problem, from the point of view of Russia; it’s probably the US that’s the problem. The important thing is that they keep working together. What we need to do is basically take baby steps, small, realistic goals that can be achieved rather than trying to change the whole landscape of the negotiations and the state of affairs between the two countries. Small realistic baby steps will help develop a sense of trust and a sense of shared interest. And I think that’s the direction we should be going in.

‘Artificially hostile atmosphere’: Moscow blasts US claims of Russian threat

RT: Why has the trust deteriorated so badly, do you think on the both sides since the so-called reset?

PH: I think it could be a number of issues. Just the interest of the US and Russia. Russia, for example, is trying to reclaim its former kind of Eastern superiority, and that may sometimes complete with some US interests or some of NATO’s interests. Other times the US is also trying to keep ourselves from sliding into place where other countries don’t want to work with us, and it’s a difficult balance. Also it largely could be just the personalities of different leaders. We see that with Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu; we saw that starting with Vladimir Putin and George Bush. So personalities do play a large role in these negotiations and discussions.