CHILD TRAFFICKING  AND CHILD ABUSE HAS TO COME TO AN END.

Trafficking in children is a global problem affecting large numbers of children. Some estimates have as many as 1.2 million children being trafficked every year. There is a demand for trafficked children as cheap labour or for sexual exploitation. Children and their families are often unaware of the dangers of trafficking, believing that better employment and lives lie in other countries.

Showing posts with label Let peace Prevail .. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Let peace Prevail .. Show all posts

Monday, November 15, 2010

Pakistan, US, India face common enemy: Holbrooke


Pakistan, US, India face common enemy: Holbrooke

US special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke

ISLAMABAD: US special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke on Sunday said that Pakistan, the United States and India face a common enemy.

Arriving for a two-day visit in Pakistan, Holbrooke told the media that some extremist organisations in Pakistan had attacked US forces in Afghanistan.

Holbrooke said that Pakistan, America and India must together face the enemies responsible for terrorism. He said that Pakistan did not have enough resources for a military operation in North Waziristan and therefore the Pakistan Army would itself decide when it was ready to launch an operation.

Pakistan well endowed to play role for peace: Gilani


Pakistan well endowed to play role for peace: Gilani

Federal Minister for Information & Broadcasting Qamar Zaman Kaira speaking at first session of Pakistan Development Forum (PDF) on Sunday


ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani said Pakistan is well endowed to play a constructive role in promoting regional and global peace, security and development.

Addressing delegates of Pakistan Development Forum (PDF) here at Prime Minister House on Sunday night, Gilani said, “The challenge of development cannot be realized through aid alone and to realize this potential, we seek mutually beneficial partnerships.”

He said, “We seek growth which is holistic, sustained and all- encompassing.”

“Trade and market access are the centre piece of our vision for a peaceful, prosperous and progressive Pakistan. This explains why I have been advocating the theme of trade not aid during my interactions with the world leaders, business community and friends abroad,” he added.

Gilani    said Pakistan Development Forum (PDF) offers a useful platform for in depth deliberations between Pakistan and its development partners on the entire spectrum of issues concerning the national development paradigm.

“The PDF is an opportunity to remind ourselves that there is a lot more to be done than fire-fighting. We cannot forget the bigger picture; while we are busy taking care of the immediate needs to the country,” he added.

He reminded that this year’s PDF gathering assumed greater significance in light of the economic fall-out of the recent floods.

He appreciated the gesture of the participating countries to share their knowledge and skills with Pakistanis.

He expressed the hope that deliberations at the Pakistan Development Forum would be productive and the forum would evolve strategies to help Pakistan fight off economic challenges in the backdrop of recent floods.

Gilani took note of the PDF deliberations on Sunday on damages and needs and as also on poverty alleviation and the provincial development agenda.

He said for Pakistan, its people and democratic government, development remained an overwhelming strategic priority.

“Our government’s economic philosophy is to put the country on a trajectory of sustainable growth by ensuring macroeconomic stability, domestic resource mobilization, restructuring of the public sector Enterprises and unleashing the productive potential of the private sector.”

The Prime Minister said that revival of the Pakistan economy was dependent on improvement in internal and external security caused by terrorism and the resolution of the energy crisis in the short term.

“It will require substantive investment in these areas as well as in development of trade corridors, improving agricultural outputs and social sectors,” he added.

The PM pointed out that some of Pakistan’s development challenges were structural and this government had made good progress in addressing structural problems like the issue of provincial autonomy.

“Other challenges faced by Pakistan are process-oriented. Our education system has been steadily bypassed by the private sector, and we have not invested as heavily as we need to,” he mentioned.

He said, “We must fix both processes and structures to build Pakistani institutions that our children can benefit from. Perhaps most importantly, as we improve the overall governance, we need to ensure that private enterprise has a chance to shine.”

The Prime Minister said in seeking and building partnerships of mutual benefit, Pakistan will always uphold its national dignity.

“As the democratic government of a sovereign Pakistan, accountable to its people, we have and will continue to subscribe to the principles of equity, equality and justice,” he added.

He underlined the need for job creation by entrepreneurs so that Pakistan could take advantage of its enormous demographic advantages.

Gilani said globalization is not simply a phenomenon of extensive communication and economic linkages but it is a process of human ties and concern.

Taking note of the help extended by the international community in natural calamities, he said, “The spirit of concern and solidarity exhibited by the entire international community during various international catastrophes as well as the recent floods in Pakistan reassured my belief that human feelings and shared values exist within the global family.”

In this global village, he said, nations cannot prosper in isolation and need to share and support one another for equitable socio-economic development.

“We have our collective stake in future and it must be our earnest effort to ensure a peaceful and prosperous life for our succeeding generations,” he added

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Towards peace: Kashmir interlocutors submit their first report


Towards peace: Kashmir interlocutors submit their first report

New Delhi: The team of interlocutors on Kashmir on Tuesday presented its first report to the government, days after returning from a visit to the troubled state that has been rocked by violent protests and civilian killings since June.
The three interlocutors - Dileep Padgaonkar, Radha Kumar and M M Ansari - met Home Minister P Chidambaram at his office and gave their initial recommendations to him.
"We gave a series of recommendations and suggestions... We are now preparing to go back to Jammu and Kashmir. We shall do so as early as in 10 days and travel to district headquarters in the state," Padgaonkar told reporters outside the home ministry office.
The three were appointed by the home minister last month for a 'serious dialogue to find a political solution' to the problems in the state following stone-pelting protests since June 11 that saw some 110 civilians killed, mostly in firing by security forces.
The interlocutors have a year-long mandate to talk to all shades of political opinion in Kashmir and suggest ways to solve the problem.
The three paid a six-day visit to Jammu and Kashmir late last month, meeting many leaders, students and families amid a boycott by separatist leaders in the valley and of political parties, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in Jammu.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

US to give $2bn to Pakistan army


US to give $2bn to Pakistan army

The goal of the aid package is to ramp up US military aid to Pakistan over a five-year period


The US lays out $2bn military aid package for Pakistan as it pressures Islamabad to crack down on Taliban and al-Qaeda.

The US has announced it will release a $2bn military aid package to Pakistan over a five-year period, as it pressed the Islamabad government to step up the fight against Taliban fighters and al-Qaeda affiliates there and in Afghanistan.

The administration of Barack Obama, the US president, will ask Congress for $2bn for Pakistan to purchase US-made arms, ammunition and accessories from 2012 to 2016.

Speaking alongside Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Pakistan's foreign minister, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the US secretary of state, announced the plan in Washington on Friday.

 "The United States has no stronger partner when it comes to counterterrorism efforts against the extremists who threaten us both than Pakistan," said Clinton, who unveiled the plans at the end of the latest round of US-Pakistani strategic talks.

The new military aid replaces a similar but less valuable package that began in 2005 and expired on October 1. It will complement $7.5bn in civilian assistance the administration has already committed to Pakistan over five years, some of which has been diverted to help the country deal with devastating floods.

Washington hopes the announcement of the new package will reassure Pakistan of the long-term US commitment to Pakistan's military needs.

'Abusive' units

Friday's aid package was announced a day after the New York Times and Britain's Guardian newspaper reported that the US will cut off aid to several Pakistani army units believed to have killed civilians and unarmed prisoners.

The two newspapers reported that some US-backed Pakistani army and special operations troops who have been in action against Taliban fighters in Swat Valley and South Waziristan along the border region with Afghanistan, will be affected by the decision.

The new aid package will not benefit Pakistani military units suspected of being involved in abuses that include extrajudicial killings and torture.

A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that funding to the Pakistani units suspected of the abuses has been cut under a 1997 amendment, which bars US military assistance from going to foreign armed forces suspected of committing atrocities.

Calling the charges of abuse "an excuse" to place conditions on the package, Senator Talha Mahmood, the chairman of Pakistan's senate standing committee for the ministry of the interior, told Al Jazeera that placing conditions on aid showed the US wanted to "impose" decisions on Pakistan.

He dismissed the importance of the US aid packages as, he said, Pakistan has already "lost $100bn" in the war against the Taliban.

"We are very important allies of Nato forces. We have sacrificed more than 30,000 causalities in Pakistan," said Mahmood.

Partnership tested

The US hopes the aid will help Pakistan bolster its efforts to go after Taliban and al-Qaeda affiliates
on its territory.

This week's talks in Washington - the third round of the US-Pakistan Strategic Dialogue - came as the countries tried to ease tensions over US military incursions across the border from Afghanistan and allegations that Islamabad is not doing enough to target Taliban fighters.

The US has signalled that its patience is running out with Islamabad's reluctance to take on the fighters, a stance that has not changed despite billions of dollars in US aid.

During the last round in Islamabad in July, Clinton announced more than $500m in aid for a variety of projects, including renovating hospitals, improving water distribution and upgrading hydroelectric dams.

The US had to re-examine its plans after the meeting, however, after Pakistan was hit by the worst floods in the country's history.

US soldier charged with killing troops in Iraq


US soldier charged with killing troops in Iraq

An American soldier was charged on Wednesday with killing two fellow US troops and wounding a third after an argument last month in a former Iraqi insurgent stronghold turned deadly.

Army Spc. Neftaly Platero was charged with two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in a Sept. 23 shooting in Fallujah.

A statement issued late Wednesday by the US military in Baghdad described the killings as premeditated but offered no other details.

Earlier, a US military spokesman said Platero was accused of shooting the three soldiers after a verbal altercation. The spokesman, Col. Barry Johnson, did not know what the argument was about.

Pfc. Gebrah Noonan, 26, of Watertown, Connecticut, and Spc. John Carrillo Jr., 20, of Stockton, California, died the day after the shooting. The name of the wounded soldier has not been released, and the statement Wednesday said the criminal investigation of the incident is ongoing.

Platero, 32, from Houston, Texas, is being held in pretrial confinement in Kuwait. He will be tried by a military court.

He was assigned to Camp Ramadi, in western Iraq, with the Army's 3rd Infantry Division based out of Fort Stewart, Georgia.

Meanwhile, four gunmen stormed the home of a policeman in northern Iraq, killing him and four members of his family. An Iraqi police official said three women were among the dead.

The late Wednesday raid occurred in the northern city of Mosul.

Mosul is no longer considered an al-Qaeda stronghold as violence around Iraq has ebbed. But police and other security officials remain prime targets for insurgents.

An official at Mosul Medical Hospital confirmed the death toll in the raid. Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not allowed to talk to the media.

Also, a local official in the oil-rich city of Kirkuk was killed, after being shot three times in the head as he was leaving his home on Wednesday night. City police Col. Ghazi Mohammed did not immediately know why Ahmed Faraj Samad, mayor of the city's al-Khadhra neighbourhood, was targeted.

Curfew lifted from all parts of Kashmir Valley


Curfew lifted from all parts of Kashmir Valley

Authorities on Saturday lifted curfew from all parts of Kashmir as the Valley limped towards normalcy despite a strike call given by hardline faction of Hurriyat Conference.

"Curfew has been lifted from all parts of Kashmir," a police spokesman said.

He said the situation so far was peaceful with no untoward incident reported from anywhere in the Valley.

Although most of the shops and business establishments around commercial hub of Lal Chowk remained closed, life in Kashmir showed signs of limping towards normalcy, official sources said. They said shops were open in many localities of Srinagar city and other towns and hamlets in the Valley.

A large number of private vehicles could be seen plying on the roads of the city and other inter-district routes, ignoring the strike call given by Geelani as part of his 10-day agitation calendar, the sources said.

However, public transport continued to remain off the roads, they said.

Kashmir Valley has been in a grip of protests, strikes and curfew since June when a 17-year-old boy was killed by a tear smoke shell fired by police at Rajouri Kadal area of the city.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Taliban join talks with Nato aid


Taliban join talks with Nato aid 

Kabul, Oct. 20: Talks to end the war in Afghanistan involve extensive, face-to-face discussions with the Taliban commanders from the highest levels of the group’s leadership, who are secretly leaving their sanctuaries in Pakistan with the help of Nato troops, officials here say.
The discussions, some of which have taken place in Kabul, are unfolding between the inner circle of the Afghan President, Mr Hamid Karzai, and members of the Quetta shura, the leadership group that oversees the Taliban war effort inside Afghanistan. Afghan leaders have also held discussions with leaders of the Haqqani network, considered to be one of the most hard-line guerrilla factions fighting here; and members of the Peshawar shura.
The Taliban leaders coming into Afghanistan for talks have left their havens in Pakistan on the assurance that they will not be attacked or arrested, sources say. Many top Taliban leaders reside in Pakistan, where they are believed to enjoy at least some official protection.
In at least one case, Taliban leaders crossed the border and boarded a Nato aircraft bound for Kabul, according to an Afghan with knowledge of the talks. In other cases, Nato troops have secured roads to allow Taliban officials to reach Afghan- and Nato-controlled areas.

‘A proper democracy and religious freedom go hand in hand' ‘Government should not endorse any particular religion'


‘A proper democracy and religious freedom go hand in hand' ‘Government should not endorse any particular religion'

Promoting harmony:Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams (second from right) along with other spiritual leaders at a dialogue-meeting in Bangalore on Wednesday.


BANGALORE: Politicians are hijacking religion for their own purposes. This was the general opinion of religious leaders who participated in the dialogue-meeting hosted by Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams at the Ecumenical Christian Centre here on Wednesday.

“Do not use politics to enforce views on others. A proper democracy and religious freedom go hand in hand,” the Archbishop said during the public discussion held after the private dialogue with Hindu leaders representing various schools of thought.

Reinforcing the view that a dialogue does not mean dilution of one's views, he said dialogue must be undertaken in the spirit of respect for others, not with the intention of putting an end to diversity and bringing about uniformity but introducing understanding.

Damaging divisiveness

Rev. Williams said divisiveness was fracturing the image of God. “One of the main dividing factors within religion is the dispute of authority. In the modern era, especially in the West, authority is not a natural concept,” he said, adding that no one was a master of his or her own situation. “We are responsible to God for how we live.”

Code of conduct

Speaking on multi-religious societies, Rev. Williams said there was a code of conduct drawn up applying to the United Kingdom where religions were expected to stand by each other if one was under attack.

Meanwhile, Hindu religious leaders too echoed the need for finding oneness. Taking offence to the perception that religion was the root of all problems, Taralabalu Jagadguru Shivamurthy Shivacharya Mahaswami said the problem arises when religious leaders try promoting concepts like private undertakings.

“We religious leaders need to mend our actions and teachings to bring unity,” he said.

Sugunendra Tirtha Swamiji of Puttige Math in Udupi said religion could be a binding force if the tenets of the Bhagavad Gita, according to which people should regard each other as places of worship due which they will start respecting each other, are followed.

Peaceful co-existence

Tridandi Srimannarayana Ramanuja Chinna Jeeyar Swami of the Jeeyar Educational Trust, Hyderabad, reiterated the importance of peaceful co-existence of religions like “the co-existence of different parts of the body.” He said no Government should endorse any religion.

Friday, October 15, 2010

In Iraq, political negotiation is a blood sport


In Iraq, political negotiation is a blood sport



The seemingly endless bartering and discussion, which could last into next year, can be unfathomable to outsiders. It's a brutal psychodrama explained by the country's ruthless history.

Reporting from Baghdad — The last seven tortuous months of bickering and bartering to form Iraq's government? It was a garden party compared to the political endgame playing out today, in which the players are like gladiators unleashed in an amphitheater.

With the American guardians of the new democratic system fading from the scene, politicians know that this moment is pivotal. To lose now may be to lose forever.

Asked about the blood sport of Iraqi politics and the challenges of ruling the country, one politician here suggested only half-jokingly, "The only way to make an Iraqi obey you is to kill him."

For outsiders, it may be difficult to fathom the idea of a political stalemate crippling a government for most of the year, destabilizing a fragile state and raising fears of new strife. But Iraq's ruthless history helps explain the psychodrama behind the seemingly endless negotiations that could drag on until early next year.

"Trust is nearly nonexistent," one party's advisor said, commenting on the suffocating mood in Baghdad, where each group suspects the worst motives in the other.

All the players have visceral fears of what ceding power means in a country where all are scarred by the cruelty of Saddam Hussein and by the sectarian war that followed his regime's demise.

Among the country's long-oppressed Shiites, every political group believes it is the sect's rightful champion, anointed to guard the Shiite majority's newfound dominance of the country.

Fears also dominate the country's once-powerful Sunnis, who are loath to back a Shiite-led government that may detain its leaders or jail hundreds indiscriminately, as they charge Shiite Prime Minister Nouri Maliki has done in the last two years.

Meanwhile, Iraq's Kurds are working feverishly to guarantee their virtual independence in northern Iraq and to ensure that Baghdad will never again victimize them. But they are no longer sure who is a reliable partner amid the capital's fractious political terrain.

At times it sounds like a farcical comedy, with dizzying combinations of paranoia.

Secular Shiite politician Iyad Allawi, whose bloc won the most seats in the spring parliamentary elections, is trusted by anti-Western cleric Muqtada Sadr's movement, but not trusted by Maliki, who in turn isn't really trusted by anyone. Kurdish leader and possible kingmaker Massoud Barzani trusts Allawi but not all the Sunnis on his slate.

All the Shiite factions have dark memories of their years of exile, when they competed for glory in the opposition, and watched old friends break away and rise above them. They also see the years under the Americans as a lesson in how, if given the chance, each faction will try to break the other, using the instruments of the state for patronage and action against rivals.

No one knows more about the fortunes that can be made, lost and regained than Maliki's Dawa party.

In conversations last fall and early spring, Kamal Saadi, a senior party member, spoke of the days of humiliation when Dawa members lived in exile in neighboring Shiite-led Iran in the 1980s. He recalls how their once and future Shiite rivals, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, rose up and, supported by Iran, eclipsed them.

At times, Dawa members felt hounded by their Iranian handlers, contributing to a persecution complex that endures today.

Dawa is also obsessed with another ghost from its past — Hussein's Baath party.

A U.S. government biography of Maliki describes the prime minister as driven by the fear that Baathists are plotting their return. "He strives to be perceived as evenhanded and nonsectarian," the biography reads, citing media reports. It continues: "U.S. diplomats, however, say … Maliki struggles to disassociate Sunnis from Baathists and Saddamists. U.S. diplomats caution he is suspicious of everyone."

Efforts by the Americans have failed to unite Maliki with his main rival, Allawi, who has enjoyed close ties with the U.S. intelligence community. Personal rancor and vanity appear to have poisoned the relationship.

A senior Maliki supporter recounts an alleged phone call from the prime minister to Allawi in 2007 meant to repair their tense relationship; Allawi deliberately ignored the call when told Maliki was on the line, the supporter claimed.

For its part, Allawi's slate has privately accused the Maliki government of trying to fabricate evidence of terrorism against its members. Members of Allawi's Iraqiya group speak of men close to Maliki in the security forces as nefarious and plotting, involved in political arrests and forced confessions.

A fear of government plotting infects everyone.

Those in the ISCI, the rival Shiite group, have watched the party's fortunes drop. Some members say they worry about their physical safety in the coming political season.

The party's leader, Ammar Hakim, turned down a request from Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to support Maliki, so strong is the mistrust, according to ISCI members and supporters.

The ISCI is weighing a coalition with Allawi in order to prevent another term for Maliki. The arrangement could put forward ISCI member and current Vice President Adel Abdul Mehdi as a compromise candidate for prime minister.

Mehdi diagnosed the country's troubles at a dinner during the recent holy month of Ramadan. He described a country that, whatever the promises of democracy, has not yet exorcised its demons.

"We lived under a regime where we called out, 'father Saddam, uncle Saddam,'" Mehdi said from a giant palace that once belonged to Hussein's family. "You cannot expect people to suddenly act normal or responsibly after Saddam."

ned.parker@latimes.com

Pakistan reopens border crossing to NATO trucks


Pakistan reopens border crossing to NATO trucks

The crossing into Afghanistan was closed 11 days ago after a NATO incursion that killed two Pakistani soldiers. Militants took advantage of the blockade to attack more than 150 parked trucks, killing 6 people.

Reporting from Islamabad, Pakistan —
Pakistan on Sunday reopened a border crossing used to ferry fuel and supplies to NATO troops in Afghanistan, ending an 11-day ban imposed after a NATO helicopter incursion that killed two Pakistani troops.

The first of hundreds of trucks and tankers stranded since Sept. 30 began moving through the Torkham checkpoint at the Khyber Pass early Sunday afternoon.

Militants had exploited the bottleneck to launch attacks across Pakistan on tankers and trucks carrying NATO supplies. More than 150 trucks were set ablaze or damaged, and at least six people were killed.
Pakistani officials made the decision Saturday, four days after the U.S. government and NATO apologized for the deaths of the Pakistani soldiers. They said the helicopter crews mistook them for insurgents they had been pursuing across the Afghan-Pakistani border.

Although U.S. officials hailed the reopening as a welcome development, relations between Islamabad and Washington remained tense. The attack NATO helicopters was seen in Pakistan as a violation of the country's sovereignty. It came at a time when the United States has dramatically stepped up its drone missile strikes against Taliban and Al Qaeda militants hiding in Pakistan's largely lawless tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan.

In September, the United States carried out 22 drone missile strikes in Pakistan's tribal areas, most of them directed at the Afghan Taliban wing known as the Haqqani network in the North Waziristan region. Haqqani fighters use Pakistani territory as a base for launching attacks on U.S., NATO and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, but Pakistan has balked at moving against them.

Pakistan plays a vital role in keeping supply lines open for U.S. and Western troops battling Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan. About 40% of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's non-weapons supplies move by truck from the Pakistani port city of Karachi to either Torkham or a southern crossing at Chaman. The Chaman crossing, in Baluchistan province, was not shut down.

In recent years, U.S. and NATO forces have established northern routes through former Soviet republics in Central Asia as alternate supply lines, allowing them to reduce their reliance on Pakistan as a transit nation. At one point, 80% of NATO's non-weapons supplies moved through Pakistan.

alex.rodriguez@latimes.com

Israeli Cabinet approves loyalty oath for new citizens


Israeli Cabinet approves loyalty oath for new citizens


"Democracy is the soul of Israel and we cannot do without it," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday.


Jerusalem (CNN) -- The Israeli Cabinet has approved an amendment to a citizenship law that requires new citizens to declare their loyalty to a "Jewish and democratic state," the prime minister's office said Sunday.
A statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office confirmed vote, saying 22 ministers voted for the change and eight voted against it.
Now that the proposal has passed the Cabinet, it will be taken up by Israel's parliament, the Knesset, for passage into law.
Before his government's weekly Cabinet meeting, Netanyahu made a forceful plea Sunday for changing the nation's Citizenship Law. He challenged criticism that the revision is undemocratic and could harm relations with the minority Arab population.
Netanyahu cited the nation's Declaration of Independence, which says Israel is both the "national state of the Jewish people" and a democratic state "in which all its citizens -- Jewish and non-Jewish -- enjoy fully equal rights."
"Democracy is the soul of Israel and we cannot do without it," Netanyahu said, according to a statement from his media adviser.
He noted that Israel was the only democracy in the Middle East, and that "there is no other Jewish state in the world."
"The combination of these two lofty values expresses the foundation of our national life and anyone who would like to join us needs to recognize this," Netanyahu said.
Netanyahu announced last week he would push now for adding language to Israel's citizenship and entry law that would declare a new citizen's allegiance to "a Jewish and democratic state."
After the prime minister announced the push, but before Sunday's Cabinet vote, Arab Knesset member Hanin Zoabi said that Israel is "discriminative in its policies and laws against all who are not Zionists." Zoabi went on to say the law "not only discriminates between Jews and non Jews, it also discriminates between Zionist Jews and non Zionists Jews."
Another Arab Knesset member Ahmed Tibi, from the Ra'am-Ta'al party, criticized the move as well, saying that "the values of Jewish and Democratic cannot be in the same definition because democracy is the equality of all the citizens."
"But an ethnic definition as Jewish is the preference of the Jew over that of the Arab and therefore it fixates an inferior status to 20 percent of the population," Tibi said.
Israel is home to roughly 6 million Jewish citizens and 1.5 million Arab citizens.
In describing the reasons for the timing of the proposed change of language, Mark Regev, a spokesman for Netanyahu, said, "What we are asking others to accept we have to demand of ourselves" -- a reference to the recent Israeli government demand that Palestinians recognize Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people.
The language of the new oath would not apply to immigrants coming to Israel under what is called the "Law of Return" that allows converted Jews and people with Jewish ancestry the right to settle in Israel and acquire citizenship.
Israel's right-wing coalition government is divided over the proposal. Minister of Social Affairs Yitzhak Herzog from the Labour Party, which questions the change, told Israeli Army radio that political pressure was behind Netanyahu's push for the move.
The problem with the amendment, Herzog said, "is not in the essence but the influence this will have on the dialogue with the Arab minority in Israel."
Recently resumed peace talks with the Palestinian leadership appear to hinge on whether Israel will extend a moratorium on construction in Jewish settlements in the West Bank. The moratorium expired on September 26.
The right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu party, also a member of the coalition government, welcomed the proposed change and denied it had anything to do with a possible extension of the settlement freeze.
"It is definitely not connected to the settlement freeze," said David Rotem, a Knesset member for the party. "We have been talking about passing this law even before the elections and it is part of our coalition agreement."
Before the changes were approved by the Cabinet, Rotem told CNN the oath was "very similar to the citizenship law in the United States, England, Australia, France and many other countries who all demand a declaration of loyalty."

At Lebanon border, Ahmadinejad predicts Israel's demise


At Lebanon border, Ahmadinejad predicts Israel's demise

BINT JBEIL, LEBANON: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad predicted the demise of arch-foe Israel on Thursday from inside a Hezbollah stronghold in south Lebanon, just miles from the border of the Jewish state. 

"The whole world knows that the Zionists are going to disappear," he said to thunderous applause before a frenzied crowd in Hezbollah's bastion of Bint Jbeil, some four kilometres (two miles) from the Israeli border. 

"The occupying Zionists today have no choice but to accept reality and go back to their countries of origin," he added. 

Israel's prime minister brushed off the hardliner's comments. 

"The best response to the hateful verbal aggression from across the border was given here 62 years ago," Benjamin Netanyahu said in Tel Aviv, referring to Israel's creation in 1948. 

In Bint Jbeil, thousands of men, women and children crammed into an outdoor stadium and onto rooftops waving Iranian, Lebanese and Hezbollah flags and cheering the hardliner whose two-day official visit has been denounced by the United States and Israel as a threat to regional stability. 

"Bint Jbeil is alive and well," Ahmadinejad told the crowd. "I salute you, people of the resistance. You are a solid mountain. We are proud of you and will remain forever by your side." 

Bint Jbeil was flattened during Israel's devastating summer 2006 war with the Shiite Hezbollah, considered a proxy of Iran. 

His visit to the south brought Ahmadinejad the closest he has ever been to Israel and was seen as a joint show of defiance with Hezbollah. 

Bint Jbeil resident Nabila, 36, said "Ahmadinejad is going to terrify the Israelis." 

"We hope to see (Hezbollah chief Hassan) Nasrallah with him here and to see them both one day on the other side of the border," she added, declining to give her last name. 

Ahmadinejad later went to Qana, which earned a grim place in history after being targeted by Israeli shelling that killed 105 civilians who had sought shelter at a UN base in 1996 during the Jewish state's "Grapes of Wrath" offensive on Lebanon. 

The village was again the site of tragedy when a shelter collapsed on dozens of people, including disabled children, during Israeli strikes at the height of the month-long 2006 war. 

Ahmadinejad laid a wreath at a memorial for victims of the 1996 strikes and also paid homage to the people of Qana. 

"Qana's martyrs are alive and its enemies are dead," he told the crowd. "You are victorious and your enemies have tasted defeat." 

Israeli officials have slammed Ahmadinejad's visit as a sign that Lebanon had "joined the axis of extremist states," while the United States called it a "provocation." 

The visit has underscored Iran's reach in Lebanon through Hezbollah, the country's most powerful military and political force. 

But it has also drawn criticism from the pro-Western parliamentary majority, who see it as an attempt to turn Lebanon into "an Iranian base on the Mediterranean." 

The visit comes at a sensitive time, with Sunni Prime Minister Saad Hariri in a standoff with Hezbollah over a UN-backed probe into the assassination of his father, former premier Rafiq Hariri. 

The tribunal is rumoured to be set to indict Hezbollah members over the 2005 assassination, and tensions have grown steadily, raising fears of renewed sectarian violence and the collapse of the hard-won national unity government. 

Although Ahmadinejad has trod carefully since his arrival, he nonetheless rose to the defence of Hezbollah at a rally on Wednesday, saying the UN court was framing the Shiite party. 

Disdain for Hariri's camp among Hezbollah supporters was apparent during Ahmadinejad's visit, when every mention of Hariri's name was met with jeers. 

The Iranian leader also gave a speech on Thursday at the state-run Lebanese University, which awarded him an honorary doctorate in political science. 

He defended Iran's controversial nuclear programme and accused the West of seeking to curtail any progress in the Middle East. 

"We are seeking to spread science and they want us to keep us in the dark," he told students and staff. 

From south Lebanon, Ahmadinejad returned to the capital to bid farewell to President Michel Sleiman before his departure. 

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Lebanon Crowds Greet Ahmadinejad


Lebanon Crowds Greet Ahmadinejad


President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran waved from his car in Beirut on Wednesday.

BEIRUT, Lebanon — President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran arrived here on Wednesday morning and was given an ecstatic welcome by supporters of Hezbollah, the militant Shiite movement his country backs.


Thousands of cheering supporters thronged the road that leads from Beirut’s airport to the city, waving Iranian flags, throwing flowers, and chanting greetings in Farsi as Mr. Ahmadinejad’s convoy slowly passed.


It is the Iranian president’s first state visit here since he was first elected in 2005, and it comes at a time of rising tension here between Hezbollah — a full member of Lebanon’s fragile coalition government — and its political rivals. The group has been waging a campaign against the international tribunal investigating the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, which is expected to indict several of the group’s members.


Hezbollah’s leaders have warned of disastrous consequences if that happens. They see the tribunal as an Israeli tool to discredit them and have pressured other factions to disavow it. Even without indictments, some fear the tensions could lead to violence or the collapse of Lebanon’s tenuous government.


American officials voiced their disapproval last week of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s plan to visit Lebanon, a trip that underscores how Iran’s influence has reached beyond Hezbollah.


After his arrival, Mr. Ahmadinejad appeared at a news conference alongside the Lebanese president, Michel Suleiman, to underscore Iran’s influence here, announcing several bilateral agreements on energy, water, and other issues. Iran, which has long provided arms and training to Hezbollah, has also offered repeatedly to help equip the Lebanese Army if the West cuts off its military aid in the wake of a border skirmish with Israel in August. Iranian money was crucial to the rebuilding effort after the 2006 war with Israel, a reconstruction effort directed by Hezbollah but whose benefits — apartment blocks and roads — were not limited to its followers.


Mr. Ahmadinejad was scheduled to appear late in the day in Beirut’s southern suburbs, at a rally organized by Hezbollah. On Thursday, he plans to go farther south — near the Israeli border — to highlight Iranian support for Hezbollah’s armed struggle with Israel.


The Israeli daily Haaretz reported that Israel has asked the United States, France, and the United Nations to pass on the message that it views Mr. Ahmadinejad’s planned visit to southern Lebanon as a provocation.


Mr. Ahmadinejad’s visit follows several other recent diplomatic missions to Lebanon, which has long been a battleground for regional powers. In August, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and President Bashar al-Assad of Syria met in Beirut in a rare show of unity. The Saudi king’s involvement was widely seen as an effort to legitimize greater Syrian influence in Lebanon, and over Hezbollah, in the hopes of countering Iran’s role here.


But Damascus is an Iranian ally and has shown no sign that of altering that or modifying its policies here. Earlier this month a Syrian judge issued arrest warrants for 33 Lebanese officials, including some close allies of Prime Minister Saad Hariri, saying they had misled the tribunal’s investigation. The Syrian foreign minister, Walid al-Moallem, has disparaged the tribunal, adding to the pressure on Mr. Hariri and his allies.


As the Iranian president’s motorcade passed on Wednesday morning, a black-clad elderly Shiite woman who gave her name only as Um Ali — the mother of Ali — waved an Iranian flag as she stood in a thick crowd of admirers, many of them women.


“He rebuilt Lebanon, we welcome him here in his second country,” she said. “God willing, we will have an Islamic republic in Lebanon.”


Nearby, a group of butchers was preparing to slaughter two camels and 10 sheep in Mr. Ahmadinejad’s honor.


“He’s an important guest, he deserves an important gift,” said Amir Salim, as he cleared the crowds away so that they would not be stained with the animals’ blood.

In West Bank, Peace Symbol Now Signifies Struggle


In West Bank, Peace Symbol Now Signifies Struggle


On Monday, Hussein Said Hussein Abu Aliya found olive trees poisoned, he said, by settlers.

TURMUS AYA, West Bank — Palestinians from villages like this one in the West Bank governorate of Ramallah still remember when the olive harvest was a joyous occasion, with whole families out for days in the fall sunshine, gathering the year’s crop and picnicking under the trees.

“We considered it like a wedding,” said Hussein Said Hussein Abu Aliya, 68.

But when Mr. Abu Aliya and his family from the neighboring village of Al-Mughayer — 36 of them in all, including grandchildren — drove out to their land this week in a snaking convoy of cars and pickup trucks with others from Turmus Aya, they found scores of their trees on the rocky slopes in various stages of decay, recently poisoned, they said, by Jewish settlers from an illegal Israeli outpost on top of the hill.

Branches drooped, the once lush, silver-green leaves were turning brown and the few olives still clinging on, which should have been plump and green or purple by harvest time, were shriveled and black. Dozens of trees nearby that Mr. Abu Aliya contended were similarly poisoned with chemicals last year stood like spindly skeletons, gray and completely bare.

Religious Jewish settlers consider the West Bank, which Israel captured from Jordan in the 1967 war, as their biblical birthright. For the 2.5 million Palestinians of the West Bank, it constitutes the heartland of a future independent state. While the Americans and Palestinians wrangle with the Israeli government over continued Israeli construction in the West Bank settlements — an issue that has stalled the embryonic peace talks — the competition for control of each acre of land here is being played out day by day.

And the olive tree, an ancient symbol of peace and plenty that has also long been a Palestinian emblem of steadfastness and commitment to the land, has increasingly become a symbol of local, almost intimate, struggle and strife.

Husniya al-Araj, 60, said she was born in a cave nearby, in an orchard of olive and almond trees. But when she reached her family lands this week, she cried out in shock. She pointed to a newly plowed field in front of her that she said was part of her family property, but that seemed to have been taken over by the settlers. It was now surrounded by a shiny new barbed-wire fence and planted with young vines.

Mahmud Ahmad Hazama, a relative who takes care of the Araj family property, said the barbed-wire fence went up in July. Folded in his wallet was a handwritten record of every change and every complaint Mr. Hazama had made to the Israeli Army and police since 1995.

“They ask me for documents,” he said. “We have all of them. The last thing they asked for was a topographic map.” He said he had received no answers so far.

Micky Rosenfeld, an Israeli police spokesman, said the police were aware of the problems. Every complaint is investigated, he says, but sometimes the culprits turn out not to be settlers, and sometimes there is not enough evidence to know. In some cases, the complaints do lead to arrests of settlers, he says.

Tamar Asraf, spokeswoman for the Binyamin Council, which represents the settlers in this region, said that for the most part the olive harvest passes peacefully, but that there were Palestinians and settlers who cause damage to one another. “We condemn them both,” she said.

Mr. Hazama’s relatives, like many other families, found their olive trees intact but empty of fruit. They argued that the olives must have been stolen by settlers, though they had no proof.

In other villages to the north, like Yanoun, Jit and Imatin, olives were stolen from hundreds of trees in the past few days, according to Rabbis for Human Rights, an Israeli organization that helps Palestinians farm lands in trouble spots year-round.

This was the first time the villagers of Turmus Aya and Al-Mughayer had been able to have access to their lands in six months. To do so, they need permission and protection from the Israeli Army, for a few days for plowing in springtime and a few days for picking in the fall. In the past, unprotected visits to the land ended with many stories of attacks by extremist settlers and burned cars.

This time, soldiers were guarding the villagers from the hilltop where the outpost, Adei Ad, sits. Three soldiers in khaki uniforms were sitting under one of Mr. Abu Aliya’s trees, almost camouflaged among its iridescent leaves while mountain gazelles sprang across the hills.

Adei Ad was established in the late 1990s on state and private Palestinian land, according to Israeli records. Though it was established without any official authorization, the Israeli Ministry of Housing and Construction provided financing for some of the infrastructure.

About 30 families live in trailers at Adei Ad, which has been scheduled for removal for seven years. The settlers have now put up an “eruv,” an elevated string on poles that encircles a community and allows observant Jews to carry objects within the proscribed area on the Sabbath. Mr. Abu Aliya has no idea what the string is for, but he says it runs right through his land.

This year, the harvest was less of a celebration, and more a show of perseverance. The Palestinian Authority governor of the Ramallah district, Laila Ghannam, joined the olive pickers and ate breakfast with the mayor of Turmus Aya under a tree.

“Our presence here is proof that this is our land and we will never give it up,” she said.

Members of a new unit from the authority’s Ministry of Agriculture were also out in the fields with notebooks, documenting the villagers’ complaints and counting the poisoned trees. They took samples of wilting branches to send to an Israeli laboratory for testing in the hope that the results could be used as future evidence in an Israeli court.

Mr. Abu Aliya, who has lost about half of his 300 olive trees, made a promise. “The moment the settlers leave,” he said, “I’ll make a big celebration. I’ll slaughter a buffalo.”

Palestinians call on US, Israel to set borders


Palestinians call on US, Israel to set borders

RAMALLAH: The Palestinians on Wednesday called on the US administration and Israel to define borders in response to Israel's demand for recognition as the Jewish state.

"We officially demand that the US administration and the Israeli government provide a map of the borders of the state of Israel which they want us to recognise," senior Palestinian official Yasser Abed Rabbo said.

His remarks came after the US State Department asked the Palestinians to extend a counter-proposal to Israel's call for recognition as a "Jewish state" in exchange for a possible extension of restrictions on settlement building.

The Palestinians rejected the offer, saying recognition of Israel's Jewish identity had no relation to the peace process.

They instead demanded that the US administration set the 1967 lines as the starting point for negotiations about final borders.

"We want to know whether this (Israeli) state includes our lands and houses in the West Bank and east Jerusalem," Abed Rabbo said, referring to Palestinian lands occupied during the 1967 Six Day War.

"If this map is based on the 1967 borders and provides for the end of the Israeli occupation over all Palestinian lands... then we recognise Israel by whatever name it applies to itself in accordance with international law," he said, without elaborating.

"We are awaiting a response from Tel Aviv and Washington," he added.

When asked about Abed Rabbo's comments, senior Israeli cabinet minister Silvan Shalom said it was "unacceptable to return to the lines of June 1967."

"There is a very large consensus in Israel on this point," Shalom told public radio.

Israel has refused to withdraw completely from the occupied territories, insisting it will hang on to major settlement blocs as part of a land exchange and maintain a security presence in the Jordan Valley.

The Palestinians recognised Israel in the early 1990s but have adamantly refused to recognise it as a Jewish state for fear that doing so would prejudge the fate of Palestinian refugees from the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

They also note that Arabs make up around 20 percent of Israel's population.

On Tuesday, State Department spokesman Philip Crowley invited both sides to make proposals on how to revive the moribund talks, which were relaunched on September 2.

"If Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu, who has offered his thoughts on both what he's willing to contribute to the process, what he thinks he needs for his people out of the process, we would hope that the Palestinians would do the same thing," he told reporters.

"And through this ongoing dialogue (we) will gain the commitment on both sides to continue and to resume in these negotiations."

Netanyahu's proposal was criticised in Israel on Tuesday, with the left-leaning Haaretz calling it a "major diversionary ploy" and the mass-selling Yediot Aharonot accusing him of trying to "torpedo" the talks.

The direct negotiations ground to a halt on September 26 after the expiry of a 10-month moratorium on the construction of new settler homes in the West Bank.

Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has refused to hold further negotiations while settlement construction continues and last week Arab League foreign ministers gave US negotiators a month to resolve the impasse.

S Sudan asks UN for peacekeepers


S Sudan asks UN for peacekeepers


South Sudanese will vote on January 9 on whether the region should become independent

Call for troop deployment along border with the north comes amid tensions in run-up to independence referendum.

South Sudan's president has asked UN Security Council envoys to deploy peacekeepers along the
Sudan's north-south border in the run-up to a referendum on southern independence, diplomats say.

Saturday's news of the request from Salva Kiir came amid growing tensions along the ill-defined border. Both sides have accused each other of building up troops there.

A diplomat said the request would be considered but the envoys made no promises.

The northern government said on Thursday that the main party of the south, Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), is deploying forces in border areas.

"The massing of military forces by the SPLM in borders’ areas is a clear violation to the protocols of security arrangement," Sawarmi Khaled, a Sudanese military spokesman, said.

"It is considered an antagonistic act because the protocols commit the SPLM to limit its forces only to places agreed on in the peace treaty."

But the SPLM on Friday said it is the Sudanese military from the north that is gearing up for fighting.

"The Sudanese army is looking for a way to initiate a war," Kuol Diem Kuol, an SPLM army spokesman, said.

"I challenge the Sudanese army to allow the UN forces in southern Sudan to investigate who is gearing up forces. Is it us or the Sudanese army?"

Abyei dispute

Under a 2005 peace agreement that ended Africa's longest-running civil war, the south is to vote on January 9 on whether to become independent or to remain part of a united Sudan.

Simultaneously, the disputed border region of Abyei will vote on whether the region should belong to the north or the south.

Mohamed Adow, reporting from Khartoum, said it is not the first time the two sides are accusing each other of massing troops at the border, near Abyei.

"It's coming at a time when there has been tension and a stalemate over the composition of the referendum commission for Abyei," he said.

"Parties are negotiating right now in Addis Ababa but so far there has been nothing tangible coming out of the talks. The parties are discussing the composition of the referendum commission and who will be eligible to vote."

Abyei's referendum law gives the right of vote to members of the southern Dinka Ngok tribe and it is up to the referendum commission to decide which "other Sudanese" are considered residents of the region and therefore eligible to vote.

The ruling National Congress Party says the Misseriya, a big pro-unity nomadic tribe which grazes its cattle in the south during the dry season, should also vote.

The SPLM says the tribe as a bloc should not be allowed to vote, but that individuals with long-term residence in the region should be able to do so.

South Sudan independence supporters tussled with riot police and pro-unity campaigners in Khartoum on Saturday, in a rare public display of the growing divisions around a looming southern secession referendum.

In the capital, Khartoum, a group of up to 40 southerners, waving banners and shouting slogans calling for independence, turned up at a 2,000-strong rally in support of Sudan's president. The protest was timed to coincide with the visit of UN Security Council envoys to the capital.

Riot police moved in after pro-unity supporters approached the southerners and shouted at them to leave and pushed towards the group.

The bitter war between north and south Sudan, lasting for more than two decades, left an estimated two million people dead.

A peace deal signed in 2005 created a federal unity government that shared power between the north's ruling party and the former southern rebels.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Report: Arab League to give US 1 month to save peace talks, By HERB KEINON AND KHALED ABU TOAMEH


Report: Arab League to give US 1 month to save peace talks, By HERB KEINON AND KHALED ABU TOAMEH  

Diplomats at Arab League meeting in Libya say some countries suggesting return to indirect talks to avoid total breakdown of negotiations; Moussa blames Israeli negativity for impasse in peace process.

Talkbacks (11) 
Arab countries will give the US one month to find a compromise which can save peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians after negotiations stalled over the issue of Israeli building in West Bank settlements, AFP reported a diplomat at the Arab League meeting in Libya as saying on Friday.

The unnamed diplomat said that a resolution to be approved later Friday by the Arab League Follow-up Committee on the peace process calls for the US administration to be given "a one month chance to seek the resumption of negotiations, including a halt to settlement [building]."

RELATED:
PA waiting for Arab League, PLO, Fatah to discuss talks
Hamas swears revenge for IDF attack that killed two members


Under the resolution, the Arab foreign ministers would reconvene in one month's time "to examine the policy alternatives if the diplomatic efforts fail."

Prior to the meeting on Friday, Arab League head Amr Moussa said the leaders  will attempt to find alternatives to the currently stalled peace process.

Moussa stated that Israel's "very, very negative" stance toward the talks is responsible for the current impasse. He added that the the Arab League does not plan to tell Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas what steps to take going forward.

Some Arab countries are proposing that Abbas return to indirect negotiations to avoid a total breakdown of Mideast peace talks, diplomats said Friday.

Abbas arrived in Libya on Thursday to seek Arab League backing for his decision to quit direct talks with Israel until the settlement construction moratorium is renewed, amid no signs that the US and Israel have a formula in hand to break the impasse.

Although Ambassador to the US Michael Oren on Thursday was the first Israeli or American official to acknowledge that Washington had offered Jerusalem inducements to extend the freeze, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu – in public statements he made later in the day – sounded more like someone trying to shift the blame for failure onto the other side, rather than someone on the verge of announcing a breakthrough.

“We honored the government decision and took upon ourselves a commitment to the international community and the US to start the peace talks,” Netanyahu said of the 10- month moratorium that ended nearly two weeks ago.

“The Palestinians waited over nine months and, immediately at the onset of the talks, set a precondition even though they had promised that there would be no preconditions.”

The prime minister said that just as his government honored its commitment regarding the settlement moratorium, “we very much hope that the Palestinians will stay in the peace talks.”


Meanwhile,  Abbas has returned to his old habit of threatening to resign if Israel does not comply with his demands, making his latest threat during a meeting in Jordan on Wednesday night with members of the Palestine National Council, the PLO’s parliament- in-exile.

Khaled Musmar, a PLO official, said that Abbas hinted during the meeting that he would resign from his post if the peace talks with Israel failed.

Jpost.com staff and Associated Press contributed to this report.

Popular Posts

Total Pageviews