CHILD TRAFFICKING  AND CHILD ABUSE HAS TO COME TO AN END.

Trafficking in children is a global problem affecting large numbers of children. Some estimates have as many as 1.2 million children being trafficked every year. There is a demand for trafficked children as cheap labour or for sexual exploitation. Children and their families are often unaware of the dangers of trafficking, believing that better employment and lives lie in other countries.

Showing posts with label CHILD RAPE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CHILD RAPE. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2015

Three-year-old girl raped in Delhi


Three-year-old girl raped in Delhi

New Delhi, June 14:A three-year-old girl was raped and a wooden object inserted into her private parts by unidentified assailants here in the national capital, police said on Sunday.

The minor girl was in critical condition after having undergone surgery at the Safdarjung Hospital.

A case has been registered against unknown people in south Delhi's Sarojini Nagar police station, and efforts were on to identify the accused, police said.

According to police, the girl, who lives with her parents in a slum cluster in Pilanji village near Sarojini Nagar, was lured and raped at an isolated plot on Saturday night.

The incident came to light when the girl was seen crying near her house, and found to be bleeding.


Saturday, December 17, 2011

School forces raped girl to apologize to attacker


School forces raped girl to apologize to attacker

A seventh grade special-education student in Missouri is suing the school district for their actions involving repeated rapes she was subjected to on school grounds.
Not only did the educators in the Republic School District not believe the girl’s cries of rape a few years ago, but they responded by reprimanding her for it and forcing her to fork over a hand-written apology to the alleged assailant, a fellow student. From there they went as far as to suspend the victim for the remainder of the school year, only for her to return the following season and be raped by the same boy again.
The lawsuit makes claims that officials in the Republic, Missouri school had the girl pen and hand-deliver an apology after she accused the student of raping her. The official filing states that the girl "finally told school officials what they wanted to hear because they wouldn't believe her," eventually retracting her rape allegation. Her parents were never approached about the letter and, following her expulsion and eventual reinstatement in the school, the girl’s mother says that educators refused her plea for extra monitoring of her daughter.
In the suit, the plaintiff alleges that the school neglected to reexamine the girl’s file in which it explicitly states that she is “conflict adverse, behaviorally passive and ‘would forego her own needs and wishes to satisfy the request of others around so she can be accepted.’”
In response to allegations that they are at fault, the Republic School District has called the suit “frivolous” and “unfounded.” This retort is despite hard evidence and a court case in which it was confirmed that the girl was raped at least once on school property.
The initial rape occurred during the 2008-2009 school year, which the girl finished from home. In February 2010, however, the lawsuit alleges that she was raped by the same student again in the school’s library. That time the girl was too troubled to report the incident, fearing that she would be reprimanded once again for lying.
Thankfully the girl’s mother brought her into the Child Advocacy Center for an examination, which at that point concluded that semen found on the victim was a match with DNA of the boy she accused of the rape. Only then was the boy brought to juvenile court, where he entered a plea of guilty.
Not before, of course, the girl was suspended for a second time. That time around the school said that she expressed disrespectful conduct and a public display of affection.
Who knew repeated rapes perpetrated on a special needs child could be affectionate?
If the school’s response seems preposterous, it should be kept in mind that this is the same school district just outside of Springfield, MO that had ordered copies of Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five out of its libraries last month for contradicting the Bible.
The school district has not offered much comment on the case, but says the student is at fault because she "neglected to use reasonable means to protect herself."

Hyderabad father rapes daughter, DNA says child belongs to her brother


Hyderabad father rapes daughter, DNA says child belongs to her brother

A father who allegedly raped his 14-year-old daughter and the victim's elder brother, who joined him in the crime, have moved the Supreme Court challenging the life imprisonment awarded to them for the offence.


Syed Issaq and his son Syed Shahabuddin, both residents of Hafeez Baba Nagar in Hyderabad's Old City, claimed that they have been falsely implicated by the victim's mother Safia Banu.


Counsel G Madhavi, appearing for the duo, claimed that the conviction recorded by the sessions court and upheld by Andhra Pradesh High Court was erroneous as they were convicted on the basis of a DNA report which established that the foetus in the victim's womb was that of Shahabuddin.


Madhavi said that the DNA test could not have been the basis for the duo's conviction as the victim, after making a statement to police that the brother too had raped her, subsequently turned hostile during the trial.


During the trial she merely testified against her father for repeatedly raping her.


The petitioner submitted that the DNA test was not a reliable piece of evidence.


According to the petition, despite the fact that the victim had turned hostile and refused to name her brother Shahabuddin, the trial court awarded the maximum sentence of life imprisonment permissible under Section 376 IPC (rape) for the father and son.


It was the prosecution's case that the victim was repeatedly raped by the father when his wife went out for work as a maid servant. The brother too on certain occasions is said to have committed the heinous offence.


The girl was threatened with dire consequences if she revealed the matter to anybody. Though the victim had initially brought the matter to the notice of her paternal grandmother, the latter is said to have silenced her saying "such things keep happening in every home and there was nothing unusual".


However, the girl complained about stomach pain to her mother and sister-in-law who took her to a hospital where she was declared pregnant. On the basis of the complaint lodged by the trio, police arrested the father and son on April 20, 2005.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

INDIA: Rape victim and her child auctioned for six rupees in Jharkhand...



INDIA: Rape victim and her child auctioned for six rupees in Jharkhand...

August 31, 2005

URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAM

31 August 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UA-153-2005: INDIA: Rape victim and her child auctioned for six rupees in Jharkhand

INDIA: Rape; Slavery; Sale of child and woman
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from reliable sources about the rape of a young woman who was subsequently sold in a public auction on 20 August 2005 in Chirgaon village, Latehar District, Jharkhand for six rupees (13 US cents).

Piary, a tribal woman was sexually abused by four people from her village Chirgaon over the past year. As a result of this Piary soon had a child and demanded that the four villagers accountable for her predicament take responsibility for her child. The village heads first decided that the perpetrators should pay some money to Piary, but when she rejected this, they then decided to auction Piary and her child off.

Piary and her daughter were auctioned off to Somarji with the approval of the villagers who also celebrated this event. An organisation working with tribal women informed the police of this gross violation. However, in the raid that followed all the perpetrators involved in this crime managed to evade the police.

It is alleged, according to an update in the news the next day, that a young man seeing Piary's plight agreed to marry her and adopt her daughter. This apparently met with everyone's approval.

However, in light of the above, please immediately ask the Chief Minister of Jharkhand to ensure that all the perpetrators including the village heads involved in the offences against the victim are arrested. The police need to be vigilant and see that all the laws and processes are in place and firmly implemented so that such incidents do not take place in the future.

Urgent Appeals Desk
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
-------------------------------------------------------------

DETAILED INFORMATION:

Name of the victim: Piary Kumari, 19-years-old, and her young daughter
Place of incident: Chirgaon Village, Chandoa Block, Chandoa Police Station, Latehar District, Jharkhand
Alleged perpetrators:
1.Jiban Turi
2.Narhu Jadav
3.Lalbir Mahato
4.Liba
5.Headmen of Chirgaon Village
6.Somarji of Balumath Village

Date of incident: 20 August 2005

Case Details

Piary Kumari, a 19-year-old tribal woman from Chirgaon Village, Jharkhand, was sexually abused by four people from her village over the past year, which resulted in her giving birth to a child. She then appealed to the senior people in her village to ask these four people to take responsibility for her daughter. After a long time, the village heads (Mukhiyas) called a meeting of the villagers and it was decided that the four perpetrators would give Rs 3000 each as a fine and Piary would be asked to leave the village as she had maintained illicit relationships with these men.

However, Piary objected to this and the village heads then decided to have an auction where Piary along with her child would be sold to the highest bidder. On 20 August 2005, an auction was organised and Somarji from Balumath Village (close to Chirgaon Village) bought Piary and her daughter for the sum of Rs six (approximately 13 US cents) amidst a huge celebration in which all the villagers actively participated.

On hearing this appalling incident, a voluntary organisation working with tribal women in Latehar district informed the police who raided Somarji's house. Unfortunately not only he but also the leaders and the four perpetrators who were involved in abusing Piary all managed to escape from their houses.

It is also alleged, according to the newspaper that a young man, Rajesh Lohar also of Balumath village, who was present during the auction agreed to marry Piary and take responsibility of her child. This was met with approval and the village heads also announced that the Rs 12,000 that was collected from the four perpetrators would be handed over to Piary for arranging the marriage.

It is extremely unfortunate that the practice of selling people still exists in remote parts of India. Slavery is a punishable offence under Indian law as much as rape is and participation in an auction where people are being sold is also an offence. This incident very much highlights the backwardness of the state and ignorance of some people.

SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please send a letter to the Chief Minister of Jharkhand asking him to arrest all the perpetrators involved in the crimes.

Sample letter:

Dear Shri Arjun Munda

Re: Rape victim and her child auctioned for six rupees in Jharkhand

Name of the victim: Piary Kumari, age 19 years, and her young daughter
Place of incident: Chirgaon Village, Chandoa Block, Chandoa Police Station, Latehar District, Jharkhand
Alleged perpetrators:
1.Jiban Turi
2.Narhu Jadav
3.Lalbir Mahato
4.Liba
5.Headmen of Chirgaon Village
6.Somarji of Balumath Village

Date of incident: 20 August 2005

I am appalled to hear about the rape of a young woman who was subsequently sold in a public auction on 20 August 2005 in Chirgaon village, Latehar District, Jharkhand for six rupees (13 US cents).

Piary, a tribal woman was sexually abused by four people from her village Chirgaon over the last year. As a result of this Piary soon had a child and demanded that the four villagers accountable for her predicament take responsibility of her child. The village heads first decided that the perpetrators should pay some money to Piary, but when she rejected this, they then decided to auction Piary and her child off.

Piary and her daughter were auctioned off to Somarji amidst approval of the villagers who also celebrated this event. An organisation working with tribal women informed the police of this gross incident and in the raid that followed all the perpetrators involved in this crime managed to evade the police.

It is alleged, according to an update in the news the next day, that a young man seeing Piary's plight agreed to marry her and adopt her daughter which met with everyone's approval.

However, in light of the above, please ensure that all the perpetrators including the village heads involved in the offences against the victim are arrested. The police need to be vigilant and see that all the laws and processes are in place and firmly implemented so that such incidents do not take place in the future.

Yours sincerely,


----------------


SEND A LETTER TO:

1.Shri Arjun Munda
Chief Minister of Jharkhand
Ranchi
Jharkhand
INDIA
Tel: +91-651-22281500/ 22281400

SEND COPIES TO:

1. Justice A.S.Anand
Chairperson
National Human Rights Commission
Sardar Patel Bhavan, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi - 110001
INDIA
Fax: +91-11-23340016 / 23366537
E-mail: nhrc@ren.nic.in

2. Mr. Kunwar Singh
Chairman
National Commission for Scheduled Tribes
Lok Nayak Bhawan, 5th Floor
New Delhi - 110 003
INDIA
Tel: +91 11 2462 4628
Fax: +91 11 2462 4628
Email: mailto:ksingh_chairman.ncst@indiatimes.com

3. Mr. Juan Miguel PETIT
Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
c/o Office Of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations at Geneva
8-14 ave de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Fax: (+41 22) 917 90 06

4. Dr. Yakin Ertürk
The Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women
OHCHR-UNOG,
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Fax:  00 41 22 917 9006
E-mail: urgent-action@ohchr.org

5. Ms. Carmen María Gallardo
Chairperson
The UN Commission on the Status of Women
United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
2 UN Plaza, DC2-12th Floor
New York, NY, 10017
USA
Fax: +1-212-963-3463
Email: daw@un.org


Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Program
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)

Friday, November 5, 2010

Bus driver gets life term for rape, abetting suicide


Bus driver gets life term for rape, abetting suicide

MANGALORE: Twenty-one months after a 15-year-old student of Pompei High School, Aikala, ended her life on February 11, 2009, at her residence over the alleged humiliation after being found in the company of a boy from another community, the second additional district and sessions judge H Sanjeeva Kumar on Thursday sentenced the boy, accused of sexually assaulting her, to life imprisonment.

The judge directed accused Abdul Saleem (27) to 10-year imprisonment under Section 366 of IPC (kidnapping, abducting or inducing a woman to compel her marriage), and life imprisonment each under Sections 305 (abetment of suicide of child or insane person) and 376 (punishment for rape) of IPC and fined him Rs 15,000, Rs 15,000 and Rs 20,000 for each of these offences. The fine amount would be paid to the parents of the victim.

Since all these sentences shall run concurrently, Saleem, 26 years when arrested in this case, in effect would be undergoing life imprisonment.

The student was allegedly harassed by right-wing elements for her proximity to Saleem, after being spotted at a secluded place with him. Persons who spotted them informed the police, who took the student and Saleem in to their custody.

Given the sensitivity of the case, state police chief Ajai Kumar Singh directed the CoD (now CID) to investigate the case, 48-hours after the incident was reported.

Fruit vendor rapes daughter


Fruit vendor rapes daughter

HYDERABAD: In a shocking incident, a 37-year-old fruit vendor allegedly raped his 12-year-old daughter, a class VI student, for two months without the knowledge of his wife at their residence at Owaisi Hills in Mustafanagar.

According to Shivarampally inspector Uma Maheshwar Rao, the incident came to light on November 1 when the girl complained of severe stomach pain. The girl's mother asked her what happened and she narrated her sordid saga.

She lodged a complaint with the Shivarampally police immediately. In the complaint, she stated that she went to her sister's house in Bahdurpura on November 1 at around 8 am. During her absence, her husband allegedly raped their daughter. And, she discovered that he had been sexually abusing their daughter for two months, the inspector said.

Since, the incident came to light, the fruit vendor has been absconding. A case was registered under section 376 (Rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and searches began to nab the culprit, he added.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Indian Businessman Allegedly Raped Daughters For 9 Years Video


Indian Businessman Allegedly Raped Daughters For 9 Years Video

MONSTER DAD: A father in Mumbai India has been sexually abusing and exploiting his daughters for the last 10 years. The elder daughter, now 21, was allegedly raped for 9 years. The businessman started raping his second daughter - a 15-year-old - just a few months ago. The elder daughter then confided in her maternal grandmother when she saw her younger sister being targeted just as she had been by her father.

india asia Child victim justice law witnessLabour trafficking torture prostitution gang rape Gandhi congress bjp Hindu Muslim christian Jew USA UN UK china Russia japan Korea Iran Saudi arabia Pakistan Kuwait Dubai Syria Iraq Afghanistan Greece France Germany maxico Switzerland Libya Canada euro Asia America army air force navy military conflict war massacre genocide 

9-year-old Russian girl raped by Indian men Video


9-year-old Russian girl raped by Indian men Video


Shock in Russia with the news that a nine-year-old Russian child raped by two Indian men in north Goa's Arambol beach in India.



India victim justice law high supreme court witness Child Labour trafficking torture prostitution gang rape Gandhi congress bjp Hindu Muslim Christian Jew Asia USA UN UK china Russia japan Korea Iran Saudi arabia Pakistan Kuwait Dubai Syria Iraq Afghanistan Greece France Germany Mexico Switzerland Libya Canada Euro America army air force navy military conflict war massacre genocide

Palestinians abused in Israeli facility: Rights group


Palestinians abused in Israeli facility: Rights group

Jerusalem: Israeli human rights groups have alleged abuse of Palestinians in Israel with backing of the state, which include violations like cruel detention conditions in sealed cells, disgraceful hygienic conditions and continuous cuffing of detainees' hands.

The B'Tselem organisation and Hamoked Center for the Defence of the Individual report, based on the testimonies of 121 detainees held in Petah Tikva detention facility of Shin Bet, also claim that the inhuman treatment of the Palestinian detainees has the backing of the state.

The other ways of interrogation includes sleep deprivation, and other methods that harm the detainees physically and mentally.

The Human Rights Groups noted that complaints on the matter have led to no criminal investigations to which the state has reportedly responded by saying that the interrogations were being supervised, and that the court had rejected similar claims in the past. The violations allegedly begin from the moment of the arrest and continue until the detainees transfer from the facility.

As per the report, nine per cent of the witnesses related that the interrogators used physical violence against them in the interrogation room.

"The use of any one of these means, certainly their combined use, constitutes cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, and in some instances, torture. All are strictly forbidden under international law and Israeli law," the organisations stressed in their report.

Thirteen of the 121 detainees reported of sleep deprivation which lasted more than 24 hours, thirty six percent of the detainees said they were humiliated and cursed by their investigators, 56 percent reported of threats, and 9 percent said they were treated violently, it said.

Many of the detainees reported that the interrogators used family members as a means of pressure - thirty six percent of the witnesses mentioned curses, threats, or acts of extortion regarding family members.

In one case, a 63-year-old widow was held in the facility so that members of her family could see her suffering while under detention, the report claims.

Two days later, the woman was released without any charges brought against her, it says. Most of the detention cells are underground, or were perceived thus by the witnesses, while the interrogation rooms, by contrast, are above ground and have windows enabling the detainee to know if it is day or night, it further added.

Those interviewed stated that an electric bulb lights the cell 24 hours a day, and the detainee is unable to change its intensity or turn it off.

This creates severe distress and causes eye pain, headaches, and vision problems, the Human Rights Groups said.

The report's authors also reveal harsh hygiene conditions saying, "One-person cells had a squat toilet that reeked, the mattresses and blankets were filthy, the detainees were not given the means to clean the cell, except in isolated cases and following insistent demand".

"35 per cent of the detainees were not provided a change of clothes for long periods and, in some cases, even during their entire stay in the facility. 27 per cent of the witnesses were not allowed to shower", they alleged.

B'Tselem and Hamoked have no doubt that "the handling and treatment of the detainees, as revealed in the report, are consistent with the philosophy of interrogation that seeks to break the detainees by causing shock and fear, detaching the detainees from things to which they are normally accustomed, and by severely depriving them of sensory stimuli, movement, and human contact".

Other components of this philosophy are physical weakness by means of sleep deprivation, reduction in food intake, exposure to cold and heat, and pain, the primary source of the pain being forced prolonged sitting in rigid bodily positions, the report argued.

"This philosophy is described in CIA interrogation manuals of the 1960s and 1980s, which were used to guide interrogators in tyrannical regimes in Latin America.

The result of the use of these methods, as stated in the manuals, is psychological regression and a detainee who becomes putty in the hands of the interrogator," it added.

The organisations also claimed that the treatment of the Palestinian detainees, as described in the report, receives the backing of the Israeli State.

Since 2001, Palestinians interrogated by Israel Security Authorities agents have filed 645 complaints to the Ministry of Justice regarding the manner in which they were interrogated, but not one of the complaints led to a criminal investigation against the interrogator.

"The State of Israel attempts to justify the severe infringement of the detainee's rights by claiming the actions are necessary to thwart serious acts of terrorism. This claim does not warrant violation of the absolute prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment," the report states.

"Furthermore, Israel's attempts to divert the public debate to what it refers to as the 'ticking-bomb dilemma' is artificial," the organisations say, explaining that "most of the Palestinians who gave testimonies for the purpose of the report were not suspected of serious offenses, in comparison to the scale of offenses allegedly committed by Palestinians who are brought before military courts in the occupied territories".

Monday, October 25, 2010

India: Teachers who gang-raped their own students linked to Modi government


India: Teachers who gang-raped their own students linked to Modi government

Narendra Modi's government has been implicated in cover-up of rape of poor girls. Photo by World Economic Forum.


An incredible case of repeated gang rape of female students in Indian colleges was revealed last year, eventually leading to the culprits being sentenced to life imprisonment. But this was no ordinary case of rape; it involved an attempt at a cover-up that led right to the top of the national government itself. It was only the courageous action of the female students, a female teacher and then the families of the victims that eventually achieved justice. The case has brought out the terrible suffering that ordinary working people in India have to bear.

On March 6, 2009, a Fast Track Court in Ahmedabad convicted all the six accused in the Patan gang rape case and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The accused are not only active members of the right-wing ‘Sangh Parivar’, but are directly associated or related to those in Narendra Modi’s cabinet.

After gang rapes of several Muslim women, including mass rape of Bilkis Bano as part of the 2002 Godhra genocide, the saffron brigades of Narendra Modi turned to poor Hindu girls, committing gang rape of at least 98 such girls in Patan, Gujarat. Most shameful was the fact that this time the offenders were all teachers and the victims were their own students. In a case, where the victim dared to withstand all humiliation, threats and harassment, the Fast Track Court ultimately found the accused guilty and sentenced them to life. The people however demanded that the accused be handed over to them.

The Patan serial gang rape case shook the conscience of civilised society, when on the heels of the electoral victory of the BJP in Gujarat, i.e. only two months after the December 2007 elections were over, it was revealed that at least six teachers of the Women’s Teacher Training College in Patan, all closely associated with Ministers in Modi’s cabinet, had committed serial gang rape of so many girl students, forcing them into submission and silence on the threat to fail them in internal assessment. It was the heroic action of one female teacher Bharati Patel and her students that resulted in exposure of the entire scandal. The organised crime had been going on inside the College with knowledge of the concerned authorities, at least since 2000.

It was political patronage for these criminals that made all complaints and protests ineffective and redundant every time. It was only after a huge public protest in Patan on February 4, where people   a twenty five thousand strong crowd   not only came in unison across the party, caste and community identities, but physically assaulted the rapists, so much so that the police had to intervene to save them and only then a case could be registered, which ultimately resulted in conviction of these rapists.

The Primary Teachers’ Certificate (PTC) College of Patan, is run by the State Government through the District Institute of Educational Technology (DIET) and is situated on the outskirts of the city. This college had become a den of criminals under the patronage of Ministers in Modi’s cabinet, especially during the two decades tenure of Anandi Patel as Education Minister. The six teachers, now sentenced to life imprisonment by the Fast Track Court for the offence of gang rape of their own student, Guddi, a poor dalit girl, since long had been indulging in a whole series of gang rape of poor girls, while all complaints made against them were going unheard with the authorities.

The kingpin among those convicted, Atul Patel, the most influential among them, is a local leader of the BJP and very close to Anandi Ben Patel, the present Revenue Minister and former Education Minister. He was in charge of the whole election campaign of the Minister in the 2002 elections, in Patan. This Anandi Ben Patel is known for her closeness with Chief Minister Narendra Modi. It is during her tenure that sexual harassment of female students had become a routine phenomenon in the state. Several direct complaints were made against Atul Patel, but all of them were suppressed by the authorities under political pressure. One may find the extent of political patronage in the fact that this Atul Patel was awarded with the All India Ramanujam Maths club, the best Maths teacher Award, when the BJP was in power at the centre. The shamefaced government had to withdraw the award after Atul Patel was exposed as kingpin in the Patan serial rape case.

The second convicted teacher Manish Parmar, the drawing teacher in the college, is a close relative of the present Education Minister Ramanlal Vora. He is famous for keeping a knife in his pocket on the college campus and the female students were terrified of him. Amazingly, while other teachers in the College were empowered to grade the students between 50-100 marks in internal assessment, Manish Parmar was specially authorised to grade the students of 250 marks. This Manish Parmar used to shortlist 10 girls in every batch, using mobile and video cameras, and a computer to upload their images, keeping the best one for himself. On October 17, 2000 a complaint was filed by a female student against Manish Parmar, but to no avail. Again in 2004 another complaint of sexual molestation was filed by a student Daksha Parmar against Manish, but in vain.

The system of internal marking was so whimsically and intriguingly designed to empower the teachers to exercise arbitrary control over the students by putting 40-44% marks out of the aggregate, at their disposal. This system virtually armed the male teachers with an unguided power to blackmail the poor and innocent female students, forcing them to submit into silence against all harassment and violence. This system of internal marking had come into question about 22 years ago when incidents similar to that in Patan had shaken Meghraj Taluka, where 15 girls were raped by their teachers in the same manner. 15 cases were lodged at that time. Later the cases were suppressed and the girl victims were denied degrees. Again, following a complaint from the PTC college at Rajkot, by a girl student, it was recommended that the system of internal marking be scrapped, but the errant teachers having direct influence inside the Modi cabinet succeeded in having the recommendation shelved off. Despite all complaints and protests and recommendations by different bodies in that regard, this power was not scrapped until the people came out on the streets, took the law into their own hands and beat up the perpetrators of the crime.

Not only the system of internal marking is so designed to put the future of hapless students at the whim of the teachers, but also arrangements were secured for the perpetration of the crime. The errant male teachers, with political patronage, conveniently secured the postings for themselves in women’s colleges. The reply of the Minister Anandi Patel and Ramanlal Vora to this deliberate mischief that there was a dearth of female teachers, is totally misplaced in view of the fact that the existing 70 female teachers appointed in State run colleges were more than sufficient to be posted in 6 girls’ colleges, while 156 male teachers could have been conveniently accommodated in 16 boys colleges. But it was knowingly done otherwise, with the connivance of the authorities and politicians, above all the Education Minister herself. The devils linked to the Modi Government were knowingly given postings in the girls’ colleges, enabling them to exploit the hapless women.

Students have explained how the teachers in the Patan College used to tell the female students to give a smile and apply honey to their lips to get marks. The principal JN Chaudhary himself was part of the entire scandal and deliberately used to visit the hostel in the late hours of the night in the absence of the rector and used to enter the rooms of students to harass them. Complaints were made against him also by the parents of the students, but the warden of the hostel, Jashoda Joshi, hand in glove with these criminals, continued to tell the guardians that it is the girls who were of questionable virtue. This Jashoda Joshi, used to assist the rapists by providing them free access to the girls’ hostel in odd hours of the night and used to pacify the girl victim after they had been raped, advising them not to make a complaint and “to learn to get used to it”. Principal Chaudhary was a Matriculate and did not even qualify for appointment to the office of Principal, but got appointed to the post thanks to his political links with those in power. KT Purania, who took over the office from JN Chaudhary, also had complaints lodged against him of a similar description by female students during his previous tenure at Palanpur College.

Bharati Patel, a female lecturer, who joined the services in 1997, and played a heroic role in defence of poor students in the Patan rape case, had herself made a written complaint way back on February 27, 2001, narrating the details of sexual exploitation of innocent female students in the college. Instead of any action being taken on her complaint, Bharati Patel was transferred to Palanpur, to subject her to hardship, as a measure of punishment for making the complaint, and managed to get transferred back only in 2007. It was Atul Patel, now a convict, who managed to wangle the transfer of Bharati Patel through the Minister Anandi Ben Patel. Bharati was threatened by Atul Patel and his criminal colleagues, but the brave woman refused to relent.

The criminal teachers, enjoying the political patronage of the Modi government, continued with what can be termed as a most heinous crime against humanity. It was reported that these beasts used to decide the question as to who would rape which girl first through a drawing of lots among them. The gang rapes were then photographed on mobile and video cameras, to further blackmail their student victims. After each gang rape they forced a heavy dose of anti-pregnancy pills down the throats of their victims and used to shave the pubic hair of their victims to wash the traces of semen and thus wipe out all evidence of the rape. This all pre-planned, points to the organised nature of the crime perpetrated by hardcore criminals, having no fear of the law.

Although sexual exploitation of female teachers and students is also rampant in private colleges, the government colleges all over Gujarat continue to outshine the private ones in this field, specially during the rule of the BJP in the State. Although the Education Minister, Anandi Patel, continued to say that no such complaint had ever been made to her, it turned out that no less than 28 female students and teachers had made written complaints during her tenure as Education Minster, but with no action being taken.

The present case, in which the six perpetrators of gang rape have been sentenced to serve life imprisonment, is the sordid story of a very bright but poor dalit girl, Guddi, who was gang raped 14 times by these beasts over a period of four and a half months, on the college campus itself and on excursion tours as part of her internship. The scandal of premeditated serial rape was exposed when on January 31 2008 the victim fainted in the prayer hall of the college and was taken to a doctor by her teacher Bharati Patel and her colleagues, who confirmed rape of the girl. 97 other students of the college then came out with their own stories of similar gang rape forced upon them by the same teachers.

Guddi is one of the five children of a daily wage labourer from the Jetalvasana village of Visnagar Taluka in Mehsana district in Gujarat. Without any aid, she had secured 89% marks in matriculation examination and more than 70% in XII standard, on her own efforts made against all odds of life. In order that her studies could continue, her father had to discontinue the studies of her brother. She wished to become a doctor, but because of the poverty in the family, she enrolled herself to become a primary teacher on July 24, 2007 at the Primary Teachers’ Certificate (PTC) College at Patan. The girls’ college is run by the Gujarat Government through the District Institute of Educational Technology (DIET). Her father requested one Prof. Baloch to see if financial aid could be arranged from the college. Baloch, in turn sent the girl to Prof. Ashwin Parmar. On September 11,2007, Ashwin Parmar called the girl to the Educational Technology room, after the recess, where he and two other teachers, Manish Parmar and Mahendra Parjapati, ripped off her clothes before taking turns to rape her. They also made videos of the gang rape and warned her not to disclose it or face the consequences. The traumatised victim thereafter started to faint at the mere sight of these teachers. On September 13, 2007, i.e. two days after the rape, when she fainted in the presence of students, the rapist teachers suggested that the girl was affected by “evil spirits” and themselves took her for witchcraft!

Fifteen days later Manish Parmar called Guddi to the college laboratory, where he was joined by two other teachers, Kiran Patel and Suresh Patel in the gang rape of the poor girl. While Manish and Suresh raped her, Kiran Patel, who raised the plea of impotence in his defence in the trial, continued to sexually abuse the girl and film the act.

On the excursion tour of students, to Khumbhwa Village, as part of her internship, between December 31, 2007 and January 11 2008, Suresh, Manish and Kiran repeated the same act at 8pm on the eve of new year and then at 3.30am in the dead of the night of January 11, after a cultural programme. Later in the month, after gang rape by five of the lecturers, Atul Patel committed repeated rape upon the girl victim. On January 25, this Atul Patel, again raped the victim in the Computer room of the college.

Due to this trauma, the victim continued to lose consciousness repeatedly at the sight of her rapist teachers. On January 30, 2008, the victim disclosed her woes to a friend and then again fainted on the next day in the prayer hall of the college. Bharati Patel took her to a Psychiatrist and then to a Gynaecologist, who confirmed rape. The friend of the victim then disclosed it to Bharati Patel. As the news of gang rape of students by the teachers in the college spread, shocked and enraged parents and guardians rushed to the college where 97 other female students, who were also subjected to gang rape by these teachers, also came out with similar complaints. A written complaint was thus made on January 31 on behalf of the 98 students victims of gang rape, molestation, outraging of modesty and criminal intimidation, etc. But because of the political influence of the culprits no action was taken against them by the authorities.

On February 4, 2008, students and their parents decided to take the matter into their own hands. They organised a demonstration and during that protest caught hold of the rapist teachers and beat them severely with sticks and brickbats and damaged their vehicles. It was now that the police swung into action to save the culprits from the wrath of the enraged public, which was calling for the lynching of the rapists.

On February 5, a spontaneous protest broke out in support of the victims, the female students, and against the rapists. A 25,000-strong crowd was on the roads, cutting across the party lines and caste and communal identities, in protest against the ghastly crime and the political patronage of the ruling BJP. Only the local leaders of Sangh Parivar had remained absent. They however failed to prevent their cadres from joining the mass protest. To pacify the angry crowd, the police however had to arrest the rapists and register a case u/s 376 and 506 of IPC, on the statement of victim Guddi. The rapist teachers were then brought before the Judicial Magistrate, who remanded them into police custody. The victim was however made to wait for more than six hours in the civil hospital before her medical examination could be conducted. Taking precautions, Bharati Patel, however, got the statement of the victim recorded before the Judicial Magistrate u/s 164 Cr.P.C. on 7 February 7.

Seeing the situation slipping out of their hands, the high-ups in the Modi government decided on a further damage control exercise. Apprehensive of the police inquiry going much beyond its apparent frame, exposing those sitting at the top of the BJP government, Narendra Modi, appointed four police officers to ensure that the inquiry in the case would remain confined only to the role of those named by the students. Hastily a magisterial inquiry was also ordered, but deliberately without any terms of reference.

On February 23, Jamna Taral, a handmaiden of the BJP was appointed as Principal of the college. Her husband was placed as the District Education Officer in Patan. His car had been impounded by the Election Commission during the 2002 elections for being misused in the election campaign of the BJP. Taral immediately started to intimidate the students and their parents to keep their hands off the case, and started harassing and defaming the student victims themselves. She threatened the students with failure in marking if they went against the culprits in the case.

While the students continued to boycott the college, the parents formed an Association to fight the injustice. Fifteen representatives of the Association, led by its president Ghemar Chaudhary, a school teacher in the city, accompanied by father of the dalit girl victim, came to Gandhinagar to meet Narendra Modi, the Chief Minister, where the inaugural session of the Legislative Assembly was in the offing. However, Narendra Modi refused to meet the delegation. Instead the delegation was routed to Education Minister Ramanlal Vora, who redirected them to the Minister of State for health and family welfare, Parbat Patel, only to be warned by the Minister against creating any trouble during the session of Assembly. They were also told to withdraw the agitation against the government. The Personal Assistant to Education Minster downplayed the incident saying “it goes on”.

Later they were told the same thing by Amit Shah, Minister of Home and Rishikesh Patel, MLA from Visnagar Taluka. None of the Ministers however exchanged a word with the father of the girl victim. Rather, Ghemar Chaudhary, the president was threatened in private of dire consequences by Amit Shah and Ramanlal Vora.

The delegation, however, submitted its complaint to the GCERT. As soon as they came out of the office of the GCERT, the delegation was surrounded by police and was taken to the Arbuda Hotel in Gojharia, to be produced before Shankar Chaudhary, MLA from Radhanpur and the BJP State Secretary from Patan, K.C. Patel. First they tried to play the caste card demanding to know how Patels and Chaudharys had joined hands with dalits. Failing this they directly threatened the delegation to withdraw their agitation.

Ghemar Chaudhary had since received a “show cause notice” for unauthorised absence from the school, while Kirit Patel ,another member of the delegation, and a lecturer at Law College Patan and member of the Senate of North Gujarat University, has received threats from the authorities. However, the culprits were neither dismissed from services nor were their degrees cancelled.

Terrified of the ire of people, the leaders of Sangh Parivar, the RSS and BJP stopped appearing in public. The state president of the BJP issued open directive to the cadres of the BJP not to support any agitation against the rapist teachers. Unable to stop the mass protests, they started to malign the protesters as anti-BJP and anti-Modi and blamed the girl victims themselves for their woes.

Failing this, the patrons of the ghastly crime then started to publicise the videos of gang rape of the girl through MMS on mobiles, to demoralise the victim. But even this could not break the resolve of the brave victim. Repelling all pressures she courageously deposed against the accused in the trial which ultimately led to the sentencing of the guilty to life imprisonment. The conviction of the guilty is said to have been founded upon consistent testimony of the victim prosecutrix, fully corroborated by forensic evidence in the form of traces of semen of the rapists from the different spots pointed out by the victim in her statement to the police and before the Court. The people thus could identify the real face of the “moral police of saffrons”, repenting to bring these patrons of criminals and gangsters to power in the state.

The elite classes always oppose publicising such events in the media, as it invites public fury against their rule at large and exposes the regime of capital as a whole. Media reports of the Patan gang rape case, however, supported the mass agitation and helped a lot in spreading the news about the crime and public protest against it. Media support for the protest helped other victims come out into the open and support the agitation. It exposed a lot the role of the “saffrons”, those moral policemen, in perpetration of the crime.

On Februray 11, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) issued notices to the Gujarat Government. The State Commission was still not constituted in the state. On February 14, several voluntary organisations and individuals joined hands in Ahmedabad to form a “Citizens Forum” against the Patan Gang Rape. The Forum decided to commemorate the Women’s Day on March 8 every year as “Patan Day”. The team of NCW which visited Gujarat, confirmed that the incident was not an isolated one and that there were many Patans in Gujarat.

In fact, not only students but also female teachers in the PTCs are also being subjected to such exploitation at the hands of those connected to power. If the situation in government colleges is so horrible, one can imagine what the state of affairs in private colleges must be. The PTCs have mushroomed in the state as a source of generation of huge profits out of the heavy fee extracted from poor students who want to become teachers, after the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) introduced the concept of self financing institutes.

More than 450 PTCs exist in Gujarat today, most of which are self-financing, with about 3000 paid seats reserved in the management quota. Out of these, about 140 are girls’ colleges where around 20,000 girls are enrolled. It is compulsory for the girls to stay in the hostels, while most of these hostels have no female wardens. No financial assistance or scholarships exist in these colleges. One can imagine what sort of training these future teachers get in these slaughterhouses. Shirking its responsibility of preparing teachers in the state, and deliberately leaving the field open for profiteers, the state government runs only 16 colleges through the DIET in the entire state of which one is in Patan.

It is simply a well orchestrated rumour that women have become safer under BJP rule, while in reality the situation has become much worse under their rule, with the imposed silence upon women in the docile society of Gujarat, linked to family honour, coupled with the rule of the conservative BJP, forces the women to keep quiet and bear the tyranny. The rule of fascist elements does not improve the conditions of women in a capitalist society, but only makes this exploitation of women more unbearable and suffocating, by choking and silencing any resistance against this exploitation.

Capitalism has made a virtual mockery of mass education. The whole system of education under capitalism has become merely a trade shop for sale of certificates, degrees and diplomas, making them a precondition for employment and thus sustenance of life. Capitalists, who own private institutions and those holding governmental power, exploit this situation of the mass of the people. Education is institutionalised into a commodity in the market, controlled by the capitalists, bureaucrats and politicians, who emerge as an organised education mafia. They rob people not only of money for obtaining the degrees and diploma, but also exploit the women sexually, who are vulnerable to it. Not only students but even teachers fall prey to it. Capitalism constitutes a hell for working people. Only socialism can guarantee a dignified life for billions of working people and for that the yoke of the rule of the capitalists has to be removed.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Police inspector jailed for raping minor


Police inspector jailed for raping minor

Hyderabad: A police inspector, accused of raping his colleague's 16-year-old daughter, surrendered on Thursday before a city court after evading arrest for over a month.
N.C.H. Rangaswamy, circle inspector of Madannapet police station in the city, surrendered before Ranga Reddy district court, which remanded him to judicial custody till October 28. He was taken to Cherlapally Jail on the city's outskirts.
The accused claimed that he was innocent and the parents of the girl were trying to implicate him in a false case.
Rangaswamy was on the run since September 1 when the Central Crime Station (CCS) registered a case against him for allegedly raping the daughter of a woman constable posted at the police commissioner's office. Hyderabad Police Commissioner AK Khan had suspended him soon after.
Rangaswamy was a frequent visitor to the woman constable's house in Saroornagar. The inspector allegedly committed the act on August 30, when he found her daughter alone. The girl's father returned home to catch the inspector red-handed.
The Saroornagar police station refused to register the case, after which the girl's parents approached the police commissioner and lodged a complaint with the Central Crime Station.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Indian-origin teacher admits to sex with pupils


Indian-origin teacher admits to sex with pupils

London: An Indian-origin teacher in Britain has admitted that she had sex with two boy-pupils at her home, a court was told.
Thirty seven-year-old Hina Patel, who worked as a teacher, met the boys at her home where they had intercourse, Daily Express reported on Wednesday.
Patel has pleaded guilty to two charges of abusing her position of trust by sexual misconduct with the boys.
She will be sentenced on November 22 at Liverpool Crown Court.
"I am appalled she used her position in such a way. We are relieved we found out at such an early stage."
"But it just shows how you have to be very vigilant and your processes have to be robust," Gary Loveridge, head teacher of the school Birkdale High, Merseyside, was quoted as saying.
Patel was suspended when the allegations came to light earlier this year.

Man arrested for raping minor


Man arrested for raping minor

LUCKNOW: A man has been arrested on charges of raping and killing an eight-year-old girl in Ashiyana area, police said on Wednesday.

Raju Ansari was arrested yesterday for allegedly killing and raping the girl, whose body was recovered from a drain in Qila locality on October 4, they said.

Police said that Raju was having an affair with the girl's mother Sanno.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Oz man jailed for 17 yrs after sexually abusing 6 girls, including daughters


Oz man jailed for 17 yrs after sexually abusing 6 girls, including daughters

Melbourne, Oct 12 : An Australian man, who sexually abused six girls, four of whom were his daughters and two that he had raised as his own, has been sentenced to do just 17 years of jail time.

Townsville District Court was told the man, 53, who cannot be named, as it would identify his victims, was guilty of six counts of maintaining a sexual relationship with a child.dded to it was sexual assault, four counts of rape and four counts of indecent treatment of a child under 16 years against six girls over a period of about 17 years.

According to the Townsville Bulletin, the abuse continued for several years and had started from when they were as young as three to 14 years of age.

The matter came to light when one of the girls complained in January 2008 to her other sisters, who had all been sworn to secrecy. It left them shocked to find out that they had all been abused.

Judge Stuart Durward described the man’s crimes as “heinous” and “emotional brutality”, given his systematic abuse over the years and his threats that the family would be separated if any of the girls ever spoke about “their little secret”.

“That any man could subject his daughters to such abuse defies rational understanding or explanation,” News.com.au quoted Judge Durward as saying.

“Each of the complainants have been deprived of the joy of a truly loving and emotionally and physically secure childhood,” he stated.

Judge Durward said once one girl reached her teenage years and stood up to her father, he would stop and then target his sexual deviance towards the next eldest daughter and so the cycle would continue.

The judge read to the court a quote from one of the daughters about the effects the abuse had on her mental well-being.

“In 2006 when I was in Normanton, I started cutting myself with a razor blade on my wrists. The only way I can describe it is that I’d rather have the pain on my wrists than in my heart,” one daughter wrote.

Another daughter said in her victim impact statement she felt like her father “stole our innocence”.

“If I pretended it didn’t happen, then I could be normal just like other kids at school. My childhood was miserable. I never had peace in my life. I was always living in fear,” she wrote.

A third daughter wrote when she was young, she thought the abuse was normal because her father told her it was called “making love”.

“I used to wonder if this happened to my friends at school too,” she stated.

Judge Durward classified the man as a serious violent offender, meaning he will be required to spend at least 80 percent of his sentence behind bars. (ANI)

Brit faces life rap for raping girl in Goa


Brit faces life rap for raping girl in Goa 

HERALD CORRESPONDENT

NZ man forces kids to have sex


NZ man forces kids to have sex


Auckland: A man in New Zealand raped his own daughter and then forced his children to have sex together, a court has heard.
The man, whose age and name were not disclosed, went on trial in the Palmerston North District Court on Tuesday on 34 charges related to three decades of alleged assault and sexual abuse, the New Zealand Press Association (NZPA) reported.
The charges include rape, child cruelty and indecent assault.
The jury was told the man in Manawatu, around 400 km from Auckland, began abusing his wife's one-year-old daughter from a previous marriage and their first child together after they married in 1963.



Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Child Rape Tests Limits Of Death Penalty, The Washington Post.


Child Rape Tests Limits Of Death Penalty, La. Law Spurs Review Of Eighth Amendment By Robert Barnes
Patrick Kennedy, 43, the subject of the appeal, raped his 8-year-old stepdaughter. She needed surgery.

Ever since the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty more than 30 years ago, justices have been finding ways to limit it.

In the intervening years, they have employed their interpretations of society's "evolving standards of decency" to remove juvenile and mentally retarded killers from death row.

Before that, they excluded kidnappers who did not kill and even some accomplices to murder. In 1977 the court also concluded that a state could not execute a man who raped an adult woman.

But on Wednesday the court will consider whether a person who rapes a child is different. Louisiana prosecutors will argue that the same societal mores that have persuaded justices to spare certain categories of criminals lead in the opposite direction when it comes to child rapists, demanding an expansion of capital punishment, not a retrenchment.

Proponents say society demands retribution for those who harm its most vulnerable members. But some child advocacy experts say the unintended consequences of the death penalty might be a decline in the reporting of sexual assaults by family members, or even an incentive for the rapist to kill the victim.

The argument comes as the court has imposed a de facto moratorium on capital punishment while justices decide in a separate case whether the current methods of lethal injection are constitutional.

Even as the number of death sentences imposed in the United States has fallen -- there were the fewest last year since capital punishment was reinstated in 1976 -- Louisiana and a handful of other states have changed their laws to allow executions for those who rape children. They are supported by additional states that say they might want to do so in the future.

"The 'evolving standards of decency' framework is not a one-way street that may lead only towards the elimination of the death penalty," the state of Texas argues in a brief joined by eight other states. "Each state's legislature should be allowed to . . . reflect its citizens' current moral judgment regarding the just deserts for certain capital crimes."

Of the 3,300 inmates on death row across the country, only two are there for a crime other than murder. Both were convicted under Louisiana's child rape statute, passed in 1995 and still the broadest in the land.

Those facts alone are a powerful argument that executing someone for rape would violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition against "cruel and unusual punishment," argue lawyers for Louisiana death row inmate Patrick Kennedy. The 43-year-old Kennedy was convicted of raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter in 1998 in an assault so brutal that the girl required surgery.

But Jeffrey L. Fisher, a Stanford University law professor who will argue Kennedy's case, said no matter how heinous the crime, the court decided in 1977's Coker v. Georgia-- its last previous ruling on the limits of capital punishment -- that rape is not subject to the ultimate penalty.

Justice Byron R. White wrote for the court: "We have the abiding conviction that the death penalty, which is unique in its severity and irrevocability, is an excessive penalty for the rapist who, as such, does not take human life."

__________________________________________________________________________________

That might have settled it, except the court noted in that decision, and in subsequent ones, that although the victim was 16, she was an "adult woman."

To Louisiana legislators, that meant there was an open question about whether capital punishment would be allowed for those who rape children. The state's Supreme Court held that children require special protection from society and that the "the degradation and devastation of child rape, and the permeation of harm resulting to victims of rape in this age category" justify the death penalty.

And it pointedly noted that "this current court, and its new members" have not considered the issue.

Louisiana has been joined in expanding the death penalty by Montana, South Carolina, Oklahoma and most recently Texas. (Florida and Georgia have older laws that have been called into question by state courts.)

Missouri Gov. Matt Blunt (R) has asked his state's legislature to impose the death penalty on child rapists after the high-profile case of a man who kidnapped a boy and held him captive for four years. Michael J. Devlin received 74 life sentences, but Blunt questioned whether that was "sufficient" for his crimes.

"This court should not foreclose a national debate on appropriate punishment for child rape," Missouri said in an amicus brief.

Louisiana argues that such initiatives are reflective of the same sort of societal trends -- albeit in the opposite direction -- that the court recognized in 2002, when it declared the death penalty unconstitutional for the mentally retarded, and in 2005, when it did the same for juveniles. Both reversed earlier decisions by the court.

Fisher and the Capital Appeals Project in New Orleans, which represented Kennedy in his appeals, countered that more states have rejected the death penalty for child rapists than have added it, and that New Jersey repealed its death penalty law entirely. "Viewed against the backdrop of 44 years without a single execution for rape of any kind, the enactments of only four states over 13 years . . . hardly signify a shift in societal attitudes," their brief argues.

Expanding the death penalty to include non-homicidal rape would separate the United States from other Western nations and align it with "only a sliver" of the world, including China, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Fisher argues.

Even if imposing the death penalty for child rapists were ruled constitutional, he said, Louisiana's law is so broad that it fails the Supreme Court's test of narrowing classifications of offenders to the worst of the worst. For instance, while other states require previous convictions before a convict is eligible for the death penalty, Louisiana does not. Anyone convicted of raping a child younger than 13 is eligible for the death penalty, even though the typical murderer would not be.

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the American Civil Liberties Union reminded the court of the "scourge of racial bias" that accompanied the execution of rapists during the middle part of the 20th century; nearly 90 percent of those executed were black.

Beyond legal issues, the law is bad policy, an unlikely coalition of social workers and groups that work to prevent sexual assaults told the court.

Her opposition "might seem counterintuitive," Judy Benitez, executive director of the Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault, said in an interview. "But our great fear is that it will increase underreporting" of the crime.

She said the "vast majority" of sexual assaults against children are committed by a family member or friend, and that other family members would be unwilling to turn over the rapist if the death penalty might be carried out.

Additionally, the imposition of the death penalty means that abusers face no greater penalty for raping and killing their victims than for solely raping them, she said.

Benitez acknowledges those are arguments that would seem better directed at legislators than the courts. But she said lawmakers are often swayed by the emotions that accompany terrible crimes.

"It's a complex area that I think needs to be looked at in a more in-depth manner than policymakers are often willing to do," she said.




Thursday, September 9, 2010

From model recovering offender to alleged rapist By Erin Alberty

From model recovering offender to alleged rapist
Man accused in this incidence 
After his previous child sex abuse charge, Richard Randall seemed to do everything right.

“He falls into the small number of men who come to our agency … hungry for treatment and the support needed in changing their lives,” Randall’s therapist wrote in 1999, before he was sentenced for asking a 9-year-old girl to touch his genitals.

Now Randall is accused of abducting and raping a 4-year-old girl in a Sandy Deseret Industries store.

“For whatever reason, a switch flipped,” said Sgt. Jon Arnold, who is heading the investigation into Tuesday’s rape allegation. “I wish I knew what made these guys tick ... why he chose to be that brazen.”

In jail booking documents, police wrote that the 4-year-old asked to go look at the toys in the store at 727 E. 9400 South, while her mother shopped. Her mother let the girl go to the toy aisle and went to check on her “within a few minutes,” police wrote.

The girl was not there.

After searching the store, asking staff for help and paging the child, the mother knocked on the door of the men’s bathroom and called out the girl’s name.

“Mom! Mom!” the girl yelled from inside the locked bathroom, police wrote.

The mother told the girl to open the door, but the girl replied, “I can’t.” The girl later told police that Randall was on top of her, investigators wrote.

The mother continued pounding on the door until Randall opened it. The mother tried to grab Randall, but he struggled and escaped, running out of the store.

Three men in the store chased Randall and tackled him in the parking lot of a nearby Taco Time, police wrote. He was booked into jail on suspicion of rape of a child, aggravated sexual abuse of a child and aggravated kidnapping.

Randall, 41, of Midvale, has not been charged with a sex crime since he pleaded guilty in 1999 to attempted sexual abuse of the 9-year-old, a 3rd-degree felony that was reduced from his initial charge of 2nd-degree felony sexual abuse of a child.

Court documents indicate he was reported then to be a model recovering offender.

“I was impressed with his apparent honesty, self understanding and motivation for treatment,” Randall’s therapist wrote before his sentencing. “He takes full responsibility not only for his offense, but for the sexual obsession that led to his offense. He is aware of his attraction to children but is ... committed to making the changes that he needs to ... refocus his sexuality upon his adult interests.”

Randall avoided his suspended 5-year prison sentence by serving 90 days in jail without incident, meeting every term of his 3-year probation and completing classes in victim empathy, assault cycle, interpersonal relationships, sex education, “thinking errors” and anger management and assertiveness, his attorney, Mark Moffat wrote.

Randall holds a bachelor’s degree in Spanish and an associate’s degree in business management, Moffat wrote in a 2003 request to reduce Randall’s conviction to a misdemeanor because the felony was deterring employers — a request that prosecutors stipulated and a judge granted.

The allegations of Randall’s audacious attack Tuesday left some Deseret Industries customers on edge.

“It makes you wary,” said Evets Wood of Riverton. “My son always wants to go straight to the toy section.”

Wood said she accompanies her son, but it’s hard to tell which other children — or adults — to keep an eye on.

“There are always kids playing with the toys,” she said. “Parents are usually hovering close by ... but I don’t know which kid is with which parent.”

Linda Lundberg, of Wellsville, said she visits DI stores daily along the Wasatch Front to shop for items that she resells on eBay.

The toy section is a known kid-zone in every store, Lund- gren said. Unlike big box retail stores, where new toys are boxed or packaged in plastic, DI has an array of unwrapped, secondhand toys in arms reach, ready to be played with.

“Kids have the game ‘Mousetrap’ out, and they’re all set up, playing it on the floor,” Lundgren said.

Lundgren once saw a woman drop off two kindergarten-age children in the toy aisle at the Logan store, telling them she’d return in an hour.

“I saw her go out to the parking lot and drive off,” Lundgren said. “I think because it’s run by the [LDS] church, they think their kids are safe there. You just don’t see it at other stores.”

Clerks at the Sandy store referred questions to LDS Church spokesman Scott Trotter, who declined to comment on the store’s security provisions. A sign on the door alerts shoppers that “Deseret Industries maintains a safe environment through police surveillance,” but Trotter would not say what that surveillance entails.

Trotter also would not comment on whether DI staff has any plans to manage its toy aisles differently, such as forbidding extended play there, posting signs or setting up a separate, supervised play area.

Arnold, who heads sex crime investigations for Sandy police, acknowledged that child sex offenders are drawn to any place where children are known to linger, whether it’s a store, a restaurant or a park. But Tuesday’s alleged attack was the first abduction or sex crime reported at the Sandy DI store, Arnold said.

“This family was at the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong person nearby,” Arnold said.

He also noted that child predators are more likely to pursue children they know personally, grooming victims over the long term, than they are to snatch strangers in broad daylight.

“It’s far more rare to have this type of action,” Arnold said.




Popular Posts

Total Pageviews